Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

I'm not saying for poal to archive a link. That would be resource intensive. However for some archive sites like archive.*, the archived URL is not included in the archive link. It gets it's own unique code.

This way I could submit a CNN article using archive but in the submission it would have an optional slot* for the actual URL.

Sub: _____

____

Title: _____

____

Link: _____

____

Unarchived: _____

where the 4th option "Unarchived" isn't necessary for submission but allows for the dupe post algorithm to catch it.

I'm not saying for poal to archive a link. That would be resource intensive. However for some archive sites like archive.*, the archived URL is not included in the archive link. It gets it's own unique code. This way I could submit a CNN article using archive but in the submission it would have an optional slot* for the actual URL. >Sub: _____ ____ >Title: _____ ____ >Link: _____ ____ >Unarchived: _____ where the 4th option "Unarchived" isn't necessary for submission but allows for the dupe post algorithm to catch it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (13).
[–] • 0 pt

I'm saying a user should be able to submit the archived link;

That's exactly what the post content field you are wasting with useless words is for.

Fuck off.

lol

[–] • 0 pt

If that's what the post content field is for then why did you make a URL dedupe script? You are stupid as fuck dude. I can post whichever link I like and make any field whichever thing I'd like.

Whatever. Fuck off.

[–] • 0 pt

why did you make a URL dedupe script?

lol Besides in your head, there's no such thing as "dedupe" script.

You are stupid as fuck dude.

lol I could honestly say the same about you.

I can post whichever link I like and make any field whichever thing I'd like.

lol You sure can

Whatever. Fuck off.

lol Ditto

[–] • 0 pt