Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

329

I'm not saying for poal to archive a link. That would be resource intensive. However for some archive sites like archive.*, the archived URL is not included in the archive link. It gets it's own unique code.

This way I could submit a CNN article using archive but in the submission it would have an optional slot* for the actual URL.

Sub: _____

____

Title: _____

____

Link: _____

____

Unarchived: _____

where the 4th option "Unarchived" isn't necessary for submission but allows for the dupe post algorithm to catch it.

I'm not saying for poal to archive a link. That would be resource intensive. However for some archive sites like archive.*, the archived URL is not included in the archive link. It gets it's own unique code. This way I could submit a CNN article using archive but in the submission it would have an optional slot* for the actual URL. >Sub: _____ ____ >Title: _____ ____ >Link: _____ ____ >Unarchived: _____ where the 4th option "Unarchived" isn't necessary for submission but allows for the dupe post algorithm to catch it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (13).
[–] [Sticky] • 1 pt

That's exactly what the post content field you are wasting with useless words is for.

[–] • 1 pt

I see why this one doesn't have a crown.

[–] • 1 pt

I see why this one is already blocked. AOU is a kike and hasn't answered a fucking thing about my post. If he would grow a pair of balls and be a man, just telling me "no". That would be better than this absurd kikery.

[–] • 2 pts

And you wonder why everyone thinks you're a kike. Look at you lust after a fake crown made of pixels.

[–] • 0 pt

Nothing about your link submission de-dupes an archive.* website. So I don't know what you mean. Whatever, I thought it would be useful.

[–] • 0 pt

Nothing about your link submission de-dupes an archive.* website.

That's up to the poster to provide an archived link, should they want to.

So I don't know what you mean.

That's totally normal.

[–] • 0 pt

I am saying NOTHING about poal archiving a link. I even fucking covered that in the OP;

I'm not saying for poal to archive a link. That would be resource intensive.

An you think I'm the one not understanding? Fuck off.

I'm saying a user should be able to submit the archived link;

https://archive.md/d6nxL

As well as the link which is being archived; https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-work-life-balance-debilitating-phrase-career-circle-2021-7

This way the de-duping script which you just added yesterday, could work THROUGH archive.* links should the submitter not be a kike.