Nothing about your link submission de-dupes an archive.* website. So I don't know what you mean. Whatever, I thought it would be useful.
Nothing about your link submission de-dupes an archive.* website.
That's up to the poster to provide an archived link, should they want to.
So I don't know what you mean.
That's totally normal.
I am saying NOTHING about poal archiving a link. I even fucking covered that in the OP;
I'm not saying for poal to archive a link. That would be resource intensive.
An you think I'm the one not understanding? Fuck off.
I'm saying a user should be able to submit the archived link;
As well as the link which is being archived; https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-work-life-balance-debilitating-phrase-career-circle-2021-7
This way the de-duping script which you just added yesterday, could work THROUGH archive.* links should the submitter not be a kike.
I'm saying a user should be able to submit the archived link;
That's exactly what the post content field you are wasting with useless words is for.
Fuck off.
lol
(post is archived)