Wouldn't they be in violation of the 3rd part
If they were given ownership of a sub, yes. If they created that sub themselves, no.
if this place is really a free speech platform, wouldn't they be in violation of the 2nd?
What part of the 2nd part they would violate?
> Wouldn't they be in violation of the 3rd part
If they were given ownership of a sub, yes. If they created that sub themselves, no.
> if this place is really a free speech platform, wouldn't they be in violation of the 2nd?
What part of the 2nd part they would violate?
Free speech isn't part of the agreement of using this site? Isn't this supposed to be a bastion of free speech?
Free speech isn't part of the agreement of using this site? Isn't this supposed to be a bastion of free speech?
You haven't answered my question.
What part of the 2nd part they would violate by making they rules in their own subs as long as it doesn't break the ToS?
You haven't answered my question.
What part of the 2nd part they would violate by making they rules in their own subs as long as it doesn't break the ToS?
They wouldn't violate ToS if they made their own rules that don't break ToS. If free speech isn't part of this site's ToS then it wouldn't violate it, but that would just mean the ToS is flawed.
They wouldn't violate ToS if they made their own rules that don't break ToS. If free speech isn't part of this site's ToS then it wouldn't violate it, but that would just mean the ToS is flawed.
(post is archived)