Change My Mind (pic8.co)
It's really gay when someone loses a debate, then replies with a bitch-post and blocks you so you cannot respond.
It's a good way for fags like Crensch to keep dissent off their posts. It makes other users believe there is consensus, because no one is responding in disagreement.
Q: Am I supposed to downvote someone when they block me? If I cannot reply to voice my disagreement, then all I am left with is downvoting.
Blocking a user should simply disable notifications, PM's from that user, and hide and posts/comments only for the user who blocked them. Everyone else should be free to view the dissent.
I'm thinking about writing up a greasemonkey script, or similar, so every post/comment a user makes who has blocked you gets an automatic downvote. To say this is abusive is contradictory. If the downvote button is not an "I disagree" button, then when I am forbidden from disagreeing, I should be free to downvote to my hearts content.
[Change My Mind](https://pic8.co/sh/LlrfAU.jpg)
It's really gay when someone loses a debate, then replies with a bitch-post and blocks you so you cannot respond.
It's a good way for fags like Crensch to keep dissent off their posts. It makes other users believe there is consensus, because no one is responding in disagreement.
## Q: Am I supposed to downvote someone when they block me? If I cannot reply to voice my disagreement, then all I am left with is downvoting.
Blocking a user should simply disable notifications, PM's from that user, and hide and posts/comments only for the user who blocked them. Everyone else should be free to view the dissent.
I'm thinking about writing up a greasemonkey script, or similar, so every post/comment a user makes who has blocked you gets an automatic downvote. **To say this is abusive is contradictory. If the downvote button is not an "I disagree" button, then when I am forbidden from disagreeing, I should be free to downvote to my hearts content.**
(post is archived)