Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

412

Change My Mind (pic8.co)

It's really gay when someone loses a debate, then replies with a bitch-post and blocks you so you cannot respond.

It's a good way for fags like Crensch to keep dissent off their posts. It makes other users believe there is consensus, because no one is responding in disagreement.

Q: Am I supposed to downvote someone when they block me? If I cannot reply to voice my disagreement, then all I am left with is downvoting.

Blocking a user should simply disable notifications, PM's from that user, and hide and posts/comments only for the user who blocked them. Everyone else should be free to view the dissent.

I'm thinking about writing up a greasemonkey script, or similar, so every post/comment a user makes who has blocked you gets an automatic downvote. To say this is abusive is contradictory. If the downvote button is not an "I disagree" button, then when I am forbidden from disagreeing, I should be free to downvote to my hearts content.

[Change My Mind](https://pic8.co/sh/LlrfAU.jpg) It's really gay when someone loses a debate, then replies with a bitch-post and blocks you so you cannot respond. It's a good way for fags like Crensch to keep dissent off their posts. It makes other users believe there is consensus, because no one is responding in disagreement. ## Q: Am I supposed to downvote someone when they block me? If I cannot reply to voice my disagreement, then all I am left with is downvoting. Blocking a user should simply disable notifications, PM's from that user, and hide and posts/comments only for the user who blocked them. Everyone else should be free to view the dissent. I'm thinking about writing up a greasemonkey script, or similar, so every post/comment a user makes who has blocked you gets an automatic downvote. **To say this is abusive is contradictory. If the downvote button is not an "I disagree" button, then when I am forbidden from disagreeing, I should be free to downvote to my hearts content.**

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding. Are you saying that users who are level 6 and above can block other users?

I'm not sure how this addresses my concern about what is to be done when a user blocks you and your only recourse is to use the downvote in a "sinful" way.

Edit: I reread your announcement. As I understand, you can reply to people who blocked you if youre level 6 and above. I assume this means the user who blocked you will not be notified of your reply. I think this is a much better way to utilize the block system. Nothing more frustrating than being in the middle of a debate, just to have the faggot block you so no one can see your epic take down.

[–] • 1 pt

The level 30 was put in place to prevent the fakevoat fags from shitting in all the posts when the voat migration happened a few months ago. It's not really necessary anymore since most of the cubicle shills backed the fuck off to fake voat.