WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

Example of a problem in the current design: ABC News joins Poal and blocks every non-shill from commenting on their shit.

Now, when others visit the ABC News post, all they see is comments from shills, giving a false perspective of reality. No one can dissent, becaue ABC News essentially made it verboten.

Seems to me, if people want to block someone, it should simply filter out their posts/comment threads, and nothing more.

Mainly, I want to tell people @MildSalsa is a time traveling bull man, but he's blocked me so no one can hear the truth. It is important people know this.

**Example of a problem in the current design**: ABC News joins Poal and blocks every non-shill from commenting on their shit. Now, when others visit the ABC News post, all they see is comments from shills, giving a false perspective of reality. No one can dissent, becaue ABC News essentially made it verboten. Seems to me, if people want to block someone, it should simply filter out their posts/comment threads, and nothing more. Mainly, I want to tell people @MildSalsa is a [time traveling bull man](https://poal.co/s/MeanwhileOnPoal/323157), but he's blocked me so no one can hear the truth. It is important people know this.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Maybe Funny was a bad example, I was just trying to make a comparison with something generic that is also found on other sites.

So anyway yea, are you okay with people snatching up subnames that are communities on other sites like Saidit, specifically to prevent them from ever becoming a community here, because the person who snatched the name hates that community?

[–] 0 pt

This is a case by case situation.

Names aren’t exclusive. What matters is what you do with a sub.

[–] 1 pt

Well, I have some ideas for a subverse community I'd like to establish and oversee.

Will reach out to you about it next month for permission.

[–] 0 pt

You can create your own sub already (level 10+)