WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

When a coward like /u/0K is being shown for the faggot he is he'll write a comment and then block you so you can't respond making it look like he won the argument.

I'd suggest making it so you can't block anyone you've replied to in the last 6 hrs.

When a coward like /u/0K is being shown for the faggot he is he'll write a comment and then block you so you can't respond making it look like he won the argument. I'd suggest making it so you can't block anyone you've replied to in the last 6 hrs.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

We don't censor opinions we dislike.

Which is retarded.

If someone were to say blacks were equal to Whites, downvote spam should cause said comment to be hidden from view.

However to your point then there needs to be an option per account of;

heavily downvoted comments and submissions are not hidden from view

Then all the dumb niggers who cry about muh downvote equals censorship!!!! can check that option and live in their own totally diverse, inclusive and tolerant paradise.

[–] 1 pt

Which is retarded.

Nope, it's well thought out and elegant. Downvoting unpopular opinions, instead of debunking them, is why reddit is a lefty shithole, and why voat was an echochamber.

>can check that option and live in their own totally diverse, inclusive and tolerant paradise.

That's a straw-man curmudgeon-bro. You don't need to tolerate a view you disagree with you can use your words; form an argument... or just call the nigger a nigger and ignore it. Freedom of speech means that you have the right to speak, but I also have the right to hear you.

Also, do you ever remember my name? The way you type to me sometimes, I can't tell. I think our bro-ship may be one way. ;-) have another upvote.

[–] 1 pt

Nope, it's well thought out and elegant. Downvoting unpopular opinions, instead of debunking them,

So I should have to debunk every single person here that comes with any of "blacks are equal" "not all jews" "women belong in politics" or some other obviously wrong kikery that's been debunked for... for always? I should have to do it again? Those are NOT opinions. Those ARE spam. However if I were to downvote every single instance of those that I saw, or similarly spam type non-opinions: I would be tagged. Which is retarded. To claim those are opinions, is dishonest, low intelligence, and suspicious. To claim they're worthy of being allowed to be said is all of the above as well.

It would be like me going in the /fitness/ sub and claiming that any normal person can eat a garbage diet and just do normal cardio to burn it off. It's not an opinion. It's false. It's carried by no science. It's been argued before for years and years and years. It reeks of plebbit FPH which gave to voats rise which gave to poals small gain in membership. But it should be allowed to be downvote spammed an hidden and the user posting it should be punished by the community.

Same goes for;

the holocaust happened

or;

the Nazi German state killed any jews as a matter of being jewish

or;

some jews are good / not all jews

interracial marriage is acceptable

homosexuality is acceptable / normal / possibly healthy

gender exists outside of linguistics

muh gun violence

muh criminal justice equality

muh oppressed nonWhites

nonWhite should be allowed in ANY once White country

Those too are NOT opinions. They are ONLY maliciously stated.

[–] 0 pt

Reddit is a lefty shithole because of censorship, vote manipulation by admins and because reddit attracts losers. There's no one left to upvote good content because they all got banned and when /r/thezognald gained traction the admins manually prevented it from getting to /r/all.

[–] 0 pt

cont;

Not allowing the community to use downvotes to punish malicious non-opinion is like forcing employees to go to (((unconscious bias))) training.

They say this is a free speech site, and they implemented up/down voats even though they consider them censorship. Admins are fucking retarded, apparently.