>Nope, it's well thought out and elegant. Downvoting unpopular opinions, instead of debunking them, So I should have to debunk every single person here that comes with any of "blacks are equal" "not all jews" "women belong in politics" or some other obviously wrong kikery that's been debunked for... for always? I should have to do it again? Those are NOT opinions. Those ARE spam. However if I were to downvote every single instance of those that I saw, or similarly spam type non-opinions: I would be tagged. Which is retarded. To claim those are opinions, is dishonest, low intelligence, and suspicious. To claim they're worthy of being allowed to be said is all of the above as well. It would be like me going in the /fitness/ sub and claiming that any normal person can eat a garbage diet and just do normal cardio to burn it off. It's not an opinion. It's false. It's carried by no science. It's been argued before for years and years and years. It reeks of plebbit FPH which gave to voats rise which gave to poals small gain in membership. But it should be allowed to be downvote spammed an hidden and the user posting it should be punished by the community. Same goes for; >the holocaust happened or; >the Nazi German state killed any jews as a matter of being jewish or; >some jews are good / not all jews >interracial marriage is acceptable >homosexuality is acceptable / normal / possibly healthy >gender exists outside of linguistics >muh gun violence >muh criminal justice equality >muh oppressed nonWhites >nonWhite should be allowed in ANY once White country Those too are NOT opinions. They are ONLY maliciously stated.