"Downvoted for disagreement"
lol who gives a fuck. You people act so up tight about your worthless kike points.
You clearly didn't read the copy pasta. It has nothing to do with "internet points" no one gives a fuck about those. Downvoting is censorship. Downvoting tells other people this is spam, or illegal, or off topic so don't look at it. We don't censor opinions we dislike.
downvoting is censorship
You are a fucking retard if you believe that.
See buddy, this is why so many people dislike you (that and the ban hammer). I don't mind, I know you're just curmudgeon-bro.
Also, you're calling the site's owners retarded (aou and pmyb2) as they believe exactly what I said. Have an upvote, bro.
We don't censor opinions we dislike.
Which is retarded.
If someone were to say blacks were equal to Whites, downvote spam should cause said comment to be hidden from view.
However to your point then there needs to be an option per account of;
heavily downvoted comments and submissions are not hidden from view
Then all the dumb niggers who cry about muh downvote equals censorship!!!! can check that option and live in their own totally diverse, inclusive and tolerant paradise.
Which is retarded.
Nope, it's well thought out and elegant. Downvoting unpopular opinions, instead of debunking them, is why reddit is a lefty shithole, and why voat was an echochamber.
>can check that option and live in their own totally diverse, inclusive and tolerant paradise.
That's a straw-man curmudgeon-bro. You don't need to tolerate a view you disagree with you can use your words; form an argument... or just call the nigger a nigger and ignore it. Freedom of speech means that you have the right to speak, but I also have the right to hear you.
Also, do you ever remember my name? The way you type to me sometimes, I can't tell. I think our bro-ship may be one way. ;-) have another upvote.
They say this is a free speech site, and they implemented up/down voats even though they consider them censorship. Admins are fucking retarded, apparently.
I don't agree with that assesment because there is an infinite amount of arguments to be made about why something is off topic.
I understand that it could be considered censorship, but if you say that, then upvotes are censorship too. Upvotes elevate certain comments to prominence above others. If enough like minded comments are posted it will drown out the ones that aren't upvoted.
I understand the argument, I just don't think it's enough. Downvoting is an integral feature of voting sites. It's not a "worst case scenario" option.
I don't agree with you, but well said, and well though out. Have an upvote.
(post is archived)