WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

411

@AOU this is an obvious misstep.

@AOU this is an obvious misstep.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

How the fuck is it not a point?

...since the user can unblock someone, comment something and block them back again right after.

So put a timer on blocking / unblocking someone equal to 6 hours since you last interacted with them.

A user can also just open a different browser or set a different user agent, log out of their main account, load up a VPN, open a private tab, logon to an alt account which they've never shared any distinguishable net features with their main account, and comment.

A user could also do a lot of things. That doesn't mean what I pointed out in the OP isn't retarded as fuck.

[–] 0 pt

So put a timer on blocking / unblocking someone equal to 6 hours since you last interacted with them.

lol You know giving orders to people who provide you with a free place/service isn't gonna get you anywhere.

Your demand is useless since and as you mentioned:

A user can also just open a different browser or.....

[–] 0 pt

lol You know giving orders to people who provide you with a free place/service isn't gonna get you anywhere.

That was a suggestion, not an order. You know that.

I've seen the type of (((users))) you deal with who absolutely do order you and other admins around. It's hilarious. It follows a script with the exact same points and the exact same methodology. This is not that, not even remotely.

A user can also just open a different browser or.....

Then "suspicious behavior" is uesless.

Then >block user is uselss.

etc.

[–] 0 pt

is useless

Life is useless too then, since death is always coming in the way.