WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

756

The block functions sets a dire censorship precedent for Poal. (See full discussion HERE).

I propose that instead of outright blocking individual users, their replies and conversations are INSTEAD automatically collapsed so that their speech is not infringed upon by allowing the choice to see it, and that those blocking them don't have to see it if they choose not to.

In this way, both parties get what they want.

The block functions sets a dire censorship precedent for Poal. (See full discussion [HERE](https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/291278)). I propose that instead of outright blocking individual users, their replies and conversations are *INSTEAD* automatically collapsed so that their speech is not infringed upon by allowing the *choice* to see it, and that those blocking them don't have to see it if they *choose* not to. In this way, both parties get what they want.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Your wording made me think you meant a penalty for the person doing the blocking, but I figured something was lost in translation lol. I don't feel like preventing you from PMing me or me from seeing your "make $xyz per hour doing surveys" spam is censorship. That's just a personal choice as long as it doesn't stifle your ability to be seen by every other user. The problem I see is any rule that can actually stop a single clinically retarded user ends up censoring users, often multiple users, who don't need censored.

I agree with your stance on blocking for the most part. If you have to block someone you simply disagree with, you're weak. If you block the ultranewretromoderntechnomusicvids sub because you're not here for that, that's not quite the same thing. In my opinion, anyway. I browse all/new, and blocking a single sperg to free up several pages of shit per day has nothing to do with anything ideological.

For example, a dozen or so users blocked my quail sub. I highly doubt it was because they think cows are superior and couldn't handle arguing with me about it. They're probably just here for news or memes. Dumb, yes. Censorship maybe, but I doubt it. It does seem kind of weird, but whatever.

What you said about arguing with shills is spot on. These people need it. The qtards need it. The "everything is fine" people need it. Hell, you and I need it.

I think if people want to block users/subs/whatever, there should be transparency. We should be able to see a list of who you blocked or subs/users blocked by other users. People aren't shamed enough anymore for being pussies.

As for finding friends and allies here, I don't think this is the place for that. Spread information and ideas. While you're doing that though, maybe I could convince you to raise some tasty little birds for your family.

[–] 1 pt

People aren't shamed enough anymore for being pussies.

This exactly. There is no shame component for doing shameful things anymore.

I live in the city unfortunately so cant raise birds here, and I don't know if I could bring myself to raise them in a dresser drawer... I do plan on leaving within maybe a year where there's land, and want to raise some. I'll let you know when I'm ready.

[–] 1 pt

Shame regulated families, communities, and society as a whole. Now, it's don't judge me!

I more meant you as in the general user, but I still think you you should have some birds, too. Someday.

[–] 1 pt

Shame regulated families, communities, and society as a whole. Now, it's don't judge me!

Good point. Society has inverted itself to shame, shame.

Stop bullying
Stop hazing
Stop using those words
School is too hard for some kids
Participation trophies
We need to stop the game there are too many points on the board!

Why strive for greatness in that world?