WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

952

Allow us to block [NSFL] but not [NSFW] and vice versa if so inclined.

I have no issue seeing a tit here and there. But I have no interest in seeing gore. None at all. [NSFW] doesn't do well enough and often titles are vague or misleading.

Additionally blocking [NSFW] prevents me from seeing subs which aren't really [NSFW] but are tagged as such for obvious reasons.

e:

This would also require a significant rule change. Everyone knows what I mean by [NSFL] material. Clearly death, gore, severe injury etc. This should also include with animals.

There should be an extremely short leash for fuck-ups with this.

Allow us to block [NSFL] but not [NSFW] and vice versa if so inclined. I have no issue seeing a tit here and there. But I have no interest in seeing gore. None at all. [NSFW] doesn't do well enough and often titles are vague or misleading. Additionally blocking [NSFW] prevents me from seeing subs which aren't really [NSFW] but are tagged as such for obvious reasons. e: This would also require a significant rule change. Everyone knows what I mean by [NSFL] material. Clearly death, gore, severe injury etc. This should also include with animals. There should be an extremely short leash for fuck-ups with this.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I prefer people not knowing if they're going to see kike smut or the true nature of non-whites when an NSFW image is clicked. It keeps the site from becoming used for porn and exposes the unwilling to what the future will look like if non-whites are allowed to exist in our nations.

[–] 0 pt

And that's retarded as fuck and a pretty kiked viewpoint.

I know reality.

I have seen it with my own two eyes. It's not pretty to experience IRL. It's not pretty to experience in video or picture or audio.

It's filth.

It's garbage.

It serves no purpose at all.

It will only desensitize people to that which is viewed. Achieving the EXACT OPPOSITE of your claimed intention.