Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

403

First off: Immigrants not respecting established community norms and making a big commotion about it.

Second: One of the ideas passed around is the concept of a SPAM vote option or flag. I imagine this idea has been discussed before, maybe even as part of Poal’s current policy.

Third: Consider the idea of allowing for downvotes without repercussion, but minimizing their ability to effect sort order. This would expose DV fags and allow for unfettered ‘I disagrees’.

____________

These are just some thoughts and ideas. Maybe they’ve already been hashed out here. Regardless, the noobs don’t know much about why Poal is the way Poal is.

First off: Immigrants not respecting established community norms and making a big commotion about it. Second: One of the ideas passed around is the concept of a SPAM vote option or flag. I imagine this idea has been discussed before, maybe even as part of Poal’s current policy. Third: Consider the idea of allowing for downvotes without repercussion, but minimizing their ability to effect sort order. This would expose DV fags and allow for unfettered ‘I disagrees’. ____________ These are just some thoughts and ideas. Maybe they’ve already been hashed out here. Regardless, the noobs don’t know much about why Poal is the way Poal is.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (30).
[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, I suppose I could have said, 'This has been suggested by me.' But I wasn't that interested in staking a personal claim on it. I really just want the ability to downvote in a way that will be acceptable to this site. I'm not even that concerned about the ability to slide comments, or punish people points-wise.

[–] • -1 pt

Why do you really feel as if you must downvote? I suppose I would like to downvote something if it is not true. That would be cool.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes. I think quantifying disagreement is a good thing. I don't want to suppress other opinions, but I do see value in the group's agreement, or disagreement, being visible - and not simply as counter-arguments in the comments.

What I'm talking about is not something unnatural, I don't think.