Someone who disagrees with someone and down votes them, yet, upvotes are allowed so that in and of itself is evidence of hurt fee fees. Its censorship.
Someone who disagrees with someone and down votes them, yet, upvotes are allowed so that in and of itself is evidence of hurt fee fees. Its censorship.
Thanks. Any idea how much downvoting you need to do to get the mark of shame?
Is it like "3 strikes you're out", or more like 1% of all votes given?
Thanks. Any idea how much downvoting you need to do to get the mark of shame?
Is it like "3 strikes you're out", or more like 1% of all votes given?
I don't know yet. I tried asking questions and they get real pissy and call me "schlomo" and thiink I want to downvote brigadeerd.
I don't know yet. I tried asking questions and they get real pissy and call me "schlomo" and thiink I want to downvote brigadeerd.
i think one down vote can be all it takes if what you are downvoting is not spam or illigal.
i think one down vote can be all it takes if what you are downvoting is not spam or illigal.
If that's the case it requires admin attention.
I've deliberately broken that rule twice to see what happens and don't have the mark of shame yet.
If that's the case it requires admin attention.
I've deliberately broken that rule twice to see what happens and don't have the mark of shame yet.
(post is archived)