I think it would improve the discovery of fresh and/or active subs if the random selection was actually sorted... You know, like Steve Jobs once pointed out, true randomness is not always desirable. I suggest:
- Subs with no activity in the last year should be at the bottom of list of "random subs",
- Subs that the user never visited (or never commented on) placed at the top of the list
Either one of those two or both would make the random feature much more effective IMO.
I think it would improve the discovery of fresh and/or active subs if the random selection was actually sorted... You know, like Steve Jobs once pointed out, true randomness is not always desirable. I suggest:
* Subs with no activity in the last year should be at the bottom of list of "random subs",
* Subs that the user never visited (or never commented on) placed at the top of the list
Either one of those two or both would make the random feature much more effective IMO.
(post is archived)