It's a viable strategy

There's no need to make up additional claims. We just need to reiterate all the already made up nonsense claims until they realize what a pile of bullshit the whole thing is.

I understand the thinking but... The problem is the audience doesn't think. In order for this strategy to work, the people hearing the message need to be able to think on their own and question the idea. Typically, the weaponized media only sends out talking points in unison to reinforce a lie/message. The truthyness doesn't matter because no one is going to research anything. Because the media complex speaks in lockstep, the audience hears a consistent message. This is enough for the feeble minded audience.

Your strategy can't work only because your message is only one against a cacophony of lies. This means your message becomes drowned out. At best, you're going to cause your audience cognitive dissonance if they even bother to try to reconcile your message against what they already believe.

If you believe in the holocaust then Trans Atantic slavery reparations have already been paid for, in blood.

Really every "Jew" is a holocaust denier. By identifying as a jew they're saying the Nazis missed some or that it wasn't really that bad. It's basically a slippery slope to saying Hitler did nothing wrong. Why don't they get called out for this?