![The holohoax is the only supporting pillar that keeps jews in control. It's old, made with cheap materials, and is starting to crack and crumble. [873x1280 - 131KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/75X81j.jpg){kind=link}
It is insane to advocate fascism as a political alternative. We can see what fascism is -- right now our Western countries are being run by liberal fascists. Antifa burning cars in the streets and shooting police is fascism. Being attacked in a restaurant because you are wearing the "wrong" hat or the "wrong" color, or because you spoke the "wrong" word, is fascism. Being told you will be fired from your job if you don't accept the Covid vaccine is fascism. Being told that you will be forced to buy an electric car in a few years, because gas-driven cars will be illegal, is fascism. Getting banned from major Internet sites because you express a different opinion from the official narrative is fascism. We are living under fascism -- how the fuck do you like it?
We are living under jewish communism.
To anyone who is on Poal more than a few weeks it's obvious that you are a jew and a glowie, dorp the act.
Also don't bother arguing with me over this, I know you glowtards are getting paid by the comment.
Downvoted for spreading jewish propaganda.
The end game is jewish communism, we are currently under jewish capitalism which follows regular capitalism. Regular capitalism ended when companies started buying their competition in the 90s.
It's more Jewish Capitalism, but ultimately it doesn't matter what system we're under, if jews are at the top they will ruin everything.
jewish capitalism and jewish communism have the same end result, genocide of the goyim.
You need to study what Hitler did for the German people, who loved him. You have been brainwashed by the (((media)))
I see any form of government that is based on voting impossible until we can show we can have a legitimate, publicly verifiable election. I haven't seen one across the globe as far as I can see.
If you read Aristotle's politics book it philosophically from the ground up describes the need for government before it begins to get into the forms of government that solve these needs, how they do it and their pros and cons otherwise. If you read the book, all these needs lead to the types of government you see today. The only problem is, the problems that they so clearly and obviously and nescessitatedly solved back then. Do not need solved today.
We don't even need government for 80% of it's original intended purpose anymore. We really need to sit down and rethink our need for government, what it was then when our current forms were made, rethink our needs now and decide what potentially whole new invention solves the problems we need government for now.
We could have, by far, an even MORE limited government than before. One that has even BETTER securities against tyranny and protection of liberties and rights.
At this point, I can't see how any form of government that allows the masses to vote could work at all. The masses are too gullible, controllable and too easily swayed. Maybe having certain requirements to vote like the U.S. used back when it was started could still work, but I don't know. Lately I've been thinking democracies and republics are too easily subverted and hard to remove if needed. At least with a monarchy, a leader can be removed quicker and "easier," especially if the populace is armed.
Noooo it will be better when we do the same things when we have the same power. Stop calling it fasc.
libertarians are propagandized into thinking fighting against their jewish oppressors is wrong because "fascism is bad because muh freedums, we all need to be individuals who have no power to fight against jewish capitalism".
(post is archived)