![Crematoriums [1299x903 - 440KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/TUAP7Z.jpg){kind=link}
Holocaust is Greek. It means, "whole burnt offering." If there were no mass incineration, by definition it wasn't a holocaust. That's the word which makes it magically charged and somehow makes the 20-40 million killed by Stalin insignificant.
This is very interesting. Interesting since not a single major source backs up this claim (but most of those sources are well known to be tainted). Do you have a credible source of this? Everyone is whining/celebrating about the decline of the Jewish population. Everyone.
What do you mean, every major source makes up this claim. This is backed by both migration and census data. Hitler himself even had an agreement with the Zionists to export Jews out of Europe. No idea what you've been looking at, but there is literally zero doubt the Jewish population remained largely unchanged or grew.
Holocaust is Greek. It means, "whole burnt offering."
But that's not what we are talking about. We are referring to the 3rd and 4th definitions of holocaust. In fact, none of the 4 definitions mean what your definition means. This is why I mentioned "etymology" because words change use over time. More specifically, no one is referring to burning offerings when they use the word "holocaust" unless they specifically clarify that they are talking about burnt offerings. That's how much the word "holocaust" has changed since the quite old and outdated use of that term.
What do you mean, every major source makes up this claim.
It does not. It says the opposite. Literally all of them. Not a single source anywhere says the global Jewish population is greater than before WWII.
I can't even find this claim on known racist sources.
We agree to disagree. Afaik, absolutely nothing you stated is correct.
I've even looked it up in older encyclopedias and dictionaries and shared pictures here. They also agree you're completely wrong.
Bluntly, you're wasting your time because objectively you're wrong. Period.
Question becomes, why are you pushing authoritatively confirmed Jewish lies? Hmm.
Why am I debunking shitty talking points that make the Holocaust Skeptics - such as myself where I have independently concluded around 600K Jews were killed - so people stop spreading retarded talking points that make us look retarded?
The answer is in the question - folks who keep repeating the same old and tired talking points are devaluing the movement. In fact, as discussed with others, I feel that this is part of Psy-Ops to discredit the Holocaust Skeptic community (notice I did not say "Holocaust Denial" community because there is too much evidence that Jews were targeted and killed by the Third Reich in a very systematic and deliberate manner). They push memes and talking points that are clearly wrong, convincing the casuals that they are correct, and then they get re-posted and repeated until the community is so tainted and poisoned by these retarded ideas that everyone within the community gets grouped in with these retarded ideas.
And you said nothing I said was correct but I linked you to 4 definitions of holocaust and only 3 and 4 applied to this subject. Words change. Context matters. For example, you cannot choose the wrong definition of "run" and pretend it applies to all homophonic uses. This is what you're doing with "holocaust".
The second point I brought up is about the global Jewish population still not recovering to pre-WWII levels. Keep in mind that Stalin killed quite a few of the Jewish Bolsheviks a few years into his dictatorship. Sure, the Jews disproportionately participated in the Leninism movement. But Stalin's patience for them and their power-grab-hunger ran out it's welcome with Stalin. This also impacted the Jewish population numbers.
All sources show that the global Jewish population is still below Pre-WII peak. And I've asked you to supply a single credible source for the population being hire than Pre-WWII levels. I didn't even know this was a talking point until you brought it up.
(post is archived)