You're probably just not American and would rather kneel to a king, cuck.
Ad hom that I must not be American.
You are a yankee, it makes sense.
Ad hom that I am American. This is jew pilpul 087 and you're extremely bad at it.
you can make the argument that elected officials are similar to authoritarian leaders except they are bound by balances and checks to their authority including (at least in America) bill of rights/ constitution/ etc. The Elected Offficial does not have complete Executive authority.
Thanks for repeating what I stated and adding (((spin))) to it.
Understand the root etymological source behind the word Anarchy (Ana -archos) greek for Anti archon, because this world has a tendency to be infiltrated and ruled by a dark elite of Hebraic Leviathans. Archons being another word for these beings. They feed off of fear and control people through matrix systems of organized religion and government.
This has absolutely nothing to do with what the etymology of the word is. That's not now and never was in argument. This has to do with the known fact that what Anarchy is, what it describes, what anarchists strive for is pure jewish control.
You have been told Anarchy is bad and it was a lie, more anarchy = less government and more sovereignty.
No. Anarchy means NO government, not "less". However that's never what (((anarchy))) brings. (((anarchy))) bring (((chav))) (((chaz))) or w/e the niggerjew autonomous zones were called that eventually fell and literally BEGGED for MORE government than was there prior. There's no discussion here. You keep jew spinning things and strawmanning while ad homing. That's fine, I don't care. You're an admitted (((anarchist))), a (((lolberg))) and bad at what you do. I'm done here. You're arguing in circles, in bad faith, lying, strawmanning, ad homing, pilpuling, and more. This isn't worth it, you're not worth it.
> Thanks for repeating what I stated and adding (((spin))) to it.
It's what I actually think from my research and hard work to understand these things. Don't be belligerent.
>This has absolutely nothing to do with what the etymology of the word is. That's not now and never was in argument. This has to do with the known fact that what Anarchy is, what it describes, what anarchists strive for is pure jewish control.
true anarchists strive for no one in control. but as for myself, although I would prefer less and less laws and small government and appreciate the sovereign ideals behind Anarchist ideas, I prefer the system of the Founding Fathers, a local, small representative government makes sense to me (with checks and balances of course)... but I may change my mind.
I think we were designed to live in small, localized tribes...
>This isn't worth it, you're not worth it.
Do whatever you want, no one is forcing you to have a civil discourse
I will not be called a liar @anticlutch I haven't lied
(post is archived)