WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

448

If I get a choice of a totalitarian system to live under I'd pick fascism.

If I get a choice of a totalitarian system to live under I'd pick fascism.

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts (edited )

Hilarious coming from a Canuck who is living under authoritarianism at the very moment he is making his claim, but is too fucking stupid to know it.

Also, if we do end up under a ring wing dictator it would be in direct response to avoiding left wing authoritarianism. I’d certainly take a right wing dictator over a left wing one if I had to choose.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Thing is, you have left wing AND right wing... Globalists...

Take macron, he's globalist, but is he right wing or left wing? Depends, sometimes he leans left of the center sometimes he leans right of the center... But he always remains globalist...

That's the tactical hedge globalists have over traditional currents; they can lean left or right anytime they want, without contradicting themselves, without compromising their agenda, because they are globalist first and foremost

And of course, most mainstream left wing movements such as socialism (not communism, socialism), are naturally more suited to fit the globalist agenda, because of their "international" tendencies, open borders and shit, while right wing movements tend to be more, territorialist... Nationalist... Less compatible by nature, unless of course when it comes to the mainstream right who didtched nationalism to embrace the "global market"/globalization... But they lost their soul/their ideological "stock in trade" by doing so... So no wonder left wing movements remained on top... Because at least their BS ideology remains consistent, they've never been nationalist/sovereignist/territorialist, they're overtly opposed to all that since the beginning. Ironically, communist countries have never been an open borders utopia... Needless to mention human rights... But I digress.

Take the reps and dems, the "uniparty". Most of them are globalists, factually, very few claim to be the opposite, very few claim to be nationalist...

Few right wing guys openly claim to be nationalist, or "soverignist" if you will. Needless to mention left wing types... There are even fewer...

...

So when it comes to a dictator accessing power in response to a coup, or a coup attempt, the question isn't so much "is he right wing or left wing?"... But rather, "is he nationalist/sovereignist/territorialist... Or just yet another globalist sellout?"

https://biblehub.com/matthew/6-24.htm

[–] 1 pt

Macron? Are you fucking kidding me?

[–] 0 pt

Not at all.

Macron plays both sides, he can be woke as fuck and at the same make drastic cuts in social aid programs https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/09/07/macr-s07.html

>Macron announces cuts to French social programs Three days before its presentation of decrees to destroy the labor code on August 31, Prime Minister Edouard Philippe announced a series of measures to complete his break with what remains of the “French social model”. Under the pretext of “modernizing” social welfare systems, the government of French President Emanuel Macron is setting out to destroy all the social rights the working class gained in struggle during the 20th century.

https://pic8.co/sh/3uC3MA.png

See?

[–] 0 pt

Literally Castro's son. A chip off the old communist block, educated by Klaus Schwab for the WEF. Cuba 2.0

[–] 3 pts

America might be full-blown Communist by 2030, but not a right wing dictatorship.

Trump is zero threat to Democracy.

It's projection. Look over there!... while we continue subverting all your institutions.

[–] 3 pts

It's gonna be one or the other. At least in a right wing fascist system I won't have much of a problem as a white man. I have kept notes on the local faggots and race mixers so I can direct the local nazi squads to them.

[–] 1 pt

But what if it is a Niggerfascist dictatorship?

[–] 2 pts

I am not discounting the possibility that we might be living in a full blown communist degenerate Weimar by 2030. We are already in a Weimar-like system now but it's hasn't reached peak misery yet. The next attack or 9/11 type event is going to bring in either Peak Weimer or Right Wing Nationalism.

[–] 3 pts

lol. TAKE YOUR VAXXXX OR YOUR FAMILY STARVES!!!!!!!

ring any bells you projecting fuckface?

[–] 2 pts

Best news I've heard in years.

[–] 2 pts

This is what they are angling for, dolts.

You would trade your father's freedom and your birthright for a bowl of soup

[–] 2 pts

Never a qualified fascist dictator when you need one.

All we get is baby Castro Nero.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

“In 2014, the suggestion that Donald Trump would become president would also have struck nearly everyone as absurd.

Except it wouldn't. Every big name for years has asked Trump himself to run and clamoured for him to be POTUS. So it's a far stretch to claim otherwise. Quite (((revisionist))) too.

If I get a choice of a totalitarian system to live under I'd pick fascism.

Fascism isn't (((totalitarian))) though. Go back to pre-k world history.

e; (((@yoga_goth)))

[–] 1 pt

(((@yoga_goth))) Fuck off you retarded cuck. You downvote a correct, on-topic, nonspam comment because you don't like the fact of the matter being talked about? Be a bigger coward. Make sure you get a smaller chastity cage, yours is way too big. I bet you could double order with a soylent opener for a deal too!

@Pubiclouse420 This is what I'm talking about. This person is clearly at least controlled by judaism. Him being a kike or not is irrelevant to me calling him as.

[–] 1 pt

I understood earlier as well what you were saying. I've had a couple of decent conversations with yoga and I'd like to remain amicable there as well. You've got a strong personality and I respect that but again I'll do my most to remain neutral in the name of discourse.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Shut up and stop whining. You downvote my comments all the time @Anticlutch

Go make me another bacon sandwich, dear. I am not a jew and I stated my personal opinion which is in disagreement to yours above in this thread.

[–] -1 pt (edited )

How is fascism not totalitarian? That's absurd

Fascism is basically totalitarianism lite.

[–] 0 pt

Rofl no dumbass. Fascism is about freedom of it's people. Fascism is not about total control of all aspects of the peoples' lives. You're jew owned if you think otherwise. The freest and most peaceful, highest trust, safest civilizations ever were Fascist. All of them. The opposite is (((totalitarian))) is (((communism))).

[–] 0 pt

Totalitarianism= a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator (not restricted by a constitution or laws or opposition etc.

Fascism=A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

Hitler did great until it was all lost. The American Revolution was successful for at least 100 some odd years.

I would rather live closer to the libertarian/ less laws/ smaller government side, than authoritarianism. Domination from a "Strong Man" Ruler is comforting and makes sense only to someone who is not accustomed to standing sovereign.

[–] 1 pt

Great. I would love a right wing dictatorship. Start by cleansing and banning the entire LGBTQASJW community, all communists, all illegals, all globalists and and all liberal femitards. Also, ban affirmative action and deport anyone who has an issue to their country of heritage or meet the ocean with weights around their legs.. maybe cement shoes.

[–] 1 pt

If this is the way they think of it then that's a good thing. Remember anything less than pure thought control of the entire populace and non rigged elections is a threat to "their" "democracy".

[–] 1 pt

YES PLEASE. BRING IT THE FUCK ON.

[–] 0 pt

Not soon enough...

Load more (6 replies)