Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.5K

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Except hydrogen cyanide (zyklon b) is an entirely different chemical from Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.

Don't let (((them))) poison the well with easily proven lies. This is to distract from the fact that zb was used long after the war for delousing and was overall safer than DDT.

[–] • 3 pts

Zyklon B is still available. It's an effective insecticide that's relatively harmless to humans unless you ingest lots of it.

I mean, it's not something you'd go and sit in, but a whiff of the resultant gas isn't going to hurt you.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Yea, although tbf the context is in the preceding sentence - 'Zyklon b was a FUMINGANT that all Nations used to kill lice.... The Americans called it (their fumigant) DDT'. A quote that is pointing out a fumigant/ insecticide was used for delousing, adding the comparative 'so the joos expect us to believe an insecticide (DDT) was used to gas them' - the subtext that the allies are purposely lying.

[–] • 0 pt

I actually think this is why the kikes chose this line for the narrative.

"They were killing us with INSECTICIDE! They think we are INSECTS. Clutch Pearls ".

[–] • 0 pt

It's just part of a longer format txt from Otto Remer, just as many former German ww2 soldiers have done voicing the absurdity of the holocaust myth. One of the major reason anyone remotely associated with running any pow camp was shot and hung within 2-3 yrs of the wars end. Simply can not have anyone that was there telling the truth.

Many of these were translated from German, so some misinterpretation of tone is common.

'they were parasites - you mis-specist !!'

[–] • 2 pts

Seems reasonable

[–] • 1 pt

As does the entire counter narrative that I've seen so far.

[–] • 2 pts

An inconvenient truth.

[–] • 1 pt

Here’s a silly question - why were they being held in the camps to begin with?

[–] • 1 pt

For the same reason we put Japanese in camps. Jewish interests had almost run the country to ruin. Hitler wanted them gone, but opposition kept them in country, so they were collected into camps in hopes that they couldn't do damage during the war effort.

[–] • 1 pt

And then what? Did he want to kill them or eventually let them go? Good comparison to the Japanese, we didn’t genocide them.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not sure what was supposed to happen in the event Germany won.

[–] • 0 pt

Same reasons the Japs were held in US camps.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I bet we would’ve put the Japanese in the camps to work if we were experiencing a labor shortage like Germany was. I bet that their labor would be so valuable that we would really want to keep them alive and working. You can only have a Gulag type Work camp if you have a large population to draw from, Germany did not.

[–] • 1 pt

If the plan was to kill the jews, why even bother loading them onto trains and moving them all over the country and putting them into camps and keeping them there for weeks and feeding them etc...

The cost of one bullet would have been far far less than that whole mess, and less than building entire camps for people to sleep in. They would have just shot them and pushed them into a hole. Way cheaper than all of that.

[–] • 1 pt

The plan wasn't to kill the jews. It was originally to move them out of Germany, but opposition kept them in-country. The next best thing was to contain the damage in central locations, it's just a war-torn and economically stretched country can't feed it's soldiers and prisoners at the same time.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, you don’t have to reinvent the wheel every time you want to do a genocide. Death marches work really well if you’re trying to hide your crimes because they spread the bodies out and it is normal for travelers to die along the roadway. That’s what you do if you’re in a hurry. If you’re patient you just starve them to death like in the Eisenhower camps, but then you need a reasonable explanation for all of the corpses.