Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

354

In addition to other sources this more fully shows that jews are not only not from the region but have no relation to anyone from the region. They aren't Edomites, they aren't Canaanites (more so canaanites aren't related to Abraham1), they have zero relation to the tree of Abraham. Most importantly (???) they aren't Semites. Semites is not jew, Semite is not musjew.

Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'jew' or to call a contemporary (modern) jew as an Israelite or Hebrew. (pic8.co)

What can be gleaned from this; - Ancient Hebrew would seem to closely resemble the Phoenician, Greek and Latin. - 'Modern Hebrew' seems to be a Yiddish/Aramaic hodgepodge, with little connection to the ancient...

1 - I don't like how (seemingly intentionally) hidden and muddied the history of what a Canaanite is, is. Is it Noah's grandson (Canaan) or of a Fallen Angel + Eve? It can't be both, but Fallen Angel + Eve is the most applicable. This trash that jews are related to Abraham by Noah's grandson Canaan is just dumb, it pulls apart the entire Holy Bible and scripture.

In addition to other sources this more fully shows that jews are not only not from the region but have no relation to anyone from the region. They aren't Edomites, they aren't Canaanites (more so canaanites aren't related to Abraham^1), they have zero relation to the tree of Abraham. Most importantly (???) they aren't Semites. Semites is not jew, Semite is not musjew. >[Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'jew' or to call a contemporary (modern) jew as an Israelite or Hebrew.](https://pic8.co/sh/XuesHi.jpg) What can be gleaned from this; - Ancient Hebrew would seem to closely resemble the Phoenician, Greek and Latin. - 'Modern Hebrew' seems to be a Yiddish/Aramaic hodgepodge, with little connection to the ancient... ^1 - I don't like how (seemingly intentionally) hidden and muddied the history of what a Canaanite is, is. Is it Noah's grandson (Canaan) or of a Fallen Angel + Eve? It can't be both, but Fallen Angel + Eve is the most applicable. This trash that jews are related to Abraham by Noah's grandson Canaan is just dumb, it pulls apart the entire Holy Bible and scripture.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (14).
[–] • 0 pt

What the fuck? What are you trying to say? He's been documenting that fact through hours and hours of video already. That's not news to him.

[–] • 1 pt

What I meant to say is that he is not very well informed on early influence of Illyrians on that region.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

You're completely wrong there. I don't blame you for that view, you may not have seen his twitter posts about this. He's explained how he does posts like this as drivers to plant the question in others' minds. Which is far more meaningful in getting through the lies than saying "no, that's false, here's proof".

For instance. I've simply told a bunch of people "Look up Simon of Trent.", that's it. They'll reply "What?" to which I'll reply "Look up Simon of Trent." Planting the seed is far superior than giving information. Indoctrination won't be taught over, it has to be "learned over".

e; Also he's not looking for "Sure but this is what it actually is and how it actually works." he's looking for the actual, physical, real evidence that's proof of those claims.

[–] • 1 pt

Well, that makes sense. I watched all his videos, and if he focused more on Illyrian history it would help him fill the holes in his research.

First Aryan civilization has started on Balkans at least 10 000 years BC, it's where the Swastika came from and also first people that expanded and populated Near East. He did cover some of it, but still way too little. It's important because it gives the direct claim to Aryans for Europe as their ancestral homeland, and takes away claim on Near and Middle East from kikes and arabs and gives it to us.