Hancock brings a ton of exposure to ancient temples and subterranean structures the scientism community ignores. Nada. He speaks to the obvious geological and paleontological evidence of a global flood. Crickets.

However, one interpretation of a strangely universal visual in ancient art, and they come out of the woodwork to scream, “Nuh uh! See! He’s a phony!”

Fucking idiots.

The problem is, he's likely completely wrong. These actually span multiple civilizations. He also says the imagines were created in the people's image when we know it's frequently the reverse. Which confirms his own myopic vision of what they must be. He's making wild assumptions and simply because they are a simple assumption built upon a ton of other unspoken assumptions, people want to believe he has a meaningful answer. He's as broken and dysfunctional as mainstream.

Whatever they are, it's this guy is likely completely wrong.