What are you trying to say? Or what is your point with this article? Is it to show the military then took advantage of the common folk despite proof of their claims? And that the same would happen now?
What are you trying to say? Or what is your point with this article? Is it to show the military then took advantage of the common folk despite proof of their claims? And that the same would happen now?
It sounds like you are off the rails. It's an interesting insight into history. One that is written at the time and not a paraphrasing of history by propagandists.
It sounds like you are off the rails. It's an interesting insight into history. One that is written at the time and not a paraphrasing of history by propagandists.
(post is archived)