This is a feint. By having you prove Anne Frank was betrayed by a fellow kike, you are implicitly admitting her story is true.
This is a feint. By having you prove Anne Frank was betrayed by a fellow kike, you are implicitly admitting her story is true.
I don't know that it's questioned that the young kike's family was in hiding and was outed, I think the only thing in question is did daddy kike write the "diary" for muh shekels.
I don't know that it's questioned that the young kike's family was in hiding and was outed, I think the only thing in question is did daddy kike write the "diary" for muh shekels.
I don't believe it. You might be convinced but I'm not.
I don't believe it. You might be convinced but I'm not.
It's really hard to tell. It wouldn't surprise me if the whole thing was made up from start to finish.
It's really hard to tell. It wouldn't surprise me if the whole thing was made up from start to finish.
Well, they were in hiding. That much is true. They did not want yo go to a camp. It is also true that Mr. Frank was a shady businessman, and likely was betrayed by a past business associate that he had sour dealings with.
Well, they were in hiding. That much is true. They did not want yo go to a camp. It is also true that Mr. Frank was a shady businessman, and likely was betrayed by a past business associate that he had sour dealings with.
(post is archived)