Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

"Ostensibly, the alliance was formed to instill the divine right of kings and Christian values in European political life, as pursued by Alexander I under the influence of his spiritual adviser Baroness Barbara von Krüdener."

why is this idiot taking advice from a woman? massive sign of weakness.

"On 29 September 1818, Alexander, Emperor Francis I of Austria and King Frederick William III of Prussia met with the Duke of Wellington, Viscount Castlereagh and the Duc de Richelieu at the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle to demand stern measures against university "demagogues", which would be realized in the Carlsbad Decrees of the following year"

a decree which banned masonic frats in the universities. ooo big deal. if you knew the problem was coming from the universities then do a sting operation and execute them all. they hesitated to do this to not 'stir up' more of a response. it's always constant hesitation until the problem is too big to handle anymore. they still held state power back then. nowadays we know it's coming from the universities too but they also have state power so no one can do anything about it anymore.

"Ostensibly, the alliance was formed to instill the divine right of kings and Christian values in European political life, as pursued by Alexander I under the influence of his spiritual adviser Baroness Barbara von Krüdener." why is this idiot taking advice from a woman? massive sign of weakness. "On 29 September 1818, Alexander, Emperor Francis I of Austria and King Frederick William III of Prussia met with the Duke of Wellington, Viscount Castlereagh and the Duc de Richelieu at the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle to demand stern measures against university "demagogues", which would be realized in the Carlsbad Decrees of the following year" a decree which banned masonic frats in the universities. ooo big deal. if you knew the problem was coming from the universities then do a sting operation and execute them all. they hesitated to do this to not 'stir up' more of a response. it's always constant hesitation until the problem is too big to handle anymore. they still held state power back then. nowadays we know it's coming from the universities too but they also have state power so no one can do anything about it anymore.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I didn't slander anyone but your yid cousins.

The fact that the nobles let the people starve to death doesn't meet the definition of slander because it's true.

If yids were behind the revolt and I'm unaware, now is a chance to educate me.

You don't know my views on Jesus, a savior, God or anything else save that in my view Bible is inherently anti-king/noble. And you certainly don't know my views on the rest of your yid fairytales.

If it was yids and masons that caused the food shortage and the king cared so much, why didn't he just take the food? Or did the army not listen to him? Maybe he was too busy dancing to notice.

I agree Christian kings were superior in most instances to non-christian kings. At least where records were available. Ofc there are many exceptions.

Yep those kings sure did a good job stopping the enslavement of everyone, which is why we are still dealing with the fall out today.

Well here's my problem. To have a king means I am a slave or my descendents will be. No ifs no ands no buts. In fact as a ethnic north European I'm keenly aware that it was Christian kings who enslaved my people and made them serfs after conversion at sword point. But that's the catholic system. Roll in with pikes, murder and enslave and make sure no on can read their holy books except them. Then hope none of the priests notice what it says.

Yeah I'm sure the Masons were corrupted too since everything in this world is in due time. Kinda like monarchies and nobility and the papcy and jews and caliphs and business ppl and everything else.

[–] • 0 pt

i don't have time to reply properly to your time dumb shit atm but ill reply to this: "Well here's my problem. To have a king means I am a slave or my descendents will be."

fuck you're stupid. you're a slave right now facing total genocide. there will always be someone who rules over you unless you're the ruler. that's how humans work, it's actually a necessity. idealist fantasies aren't reality.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

The issue is that you're functionally retarded and think that serfdom at the hands of some corrupt popes is better than what we have.

When exactly have my people not faced genocide? In deep antiquity, if they lost they were genocided, yet here we are. The Roman's tried to genocide us. In the end we destroyed their empire and divided the spoils. The catholics tried it, a few generations later we smashed their authority and they remain a church for a third of Europe and some poors in South America, with fewer and fewer paying heed to their yid fairytales everyday. Now they are a shadow of themselves attempting to curry favor from some muzzie invaders, since muzzies are also cool with raping kids. One can only imagine the fate that awaits these new adversaries.

Yeah without an authority there is chaos, which is scary to globohomos and cowards.

What I find interesting is that you're not smart enough to notice that this is about destruction and renewal and not govt type. Since corruption will kill any system without someone destroying it.

[–] • 0 pt

what? neither of them ever tried to genocide you..... :/ fuck me why is every cunt who replies to me on the internet so fucking stupid. can't any of you idiots ever argue using basic common sense?