Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

There's a reason why 1848 is swept under the rug, and nobody will openly talk about the judeo-masonic incitement of it aside from 'nazi propaganda': https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/083/137/319/original/ebf108a348325ee4.jpg

i did find this scholar mention it 'indirectly' by using the term 'armed maestranze':

"but as ferdinando malvica, author of a major unpublished contemporary chronicle of the palermitan revolution pointed out, the streets soon also filled with armed maestranze (members of craftsmen’s corporations) and, more disturbingly, with squads from the surrounding countryside: these, he wrote, were ‘ferocious men, almost devoid of human feeling, as bloodthirsty as they were boorish, ugly people by whom the beautiful civic capital of sicily found itself surrounded, infernal tribes razze infernali peopled only by creatures in whom nothing was human but their sunburned countenances’."

https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n05/christopher-clark/why-should-we-think-about-the-revolutions-of-1848-now

maestranze was the term used for 'guilds' in medieval italy: "in north-western europe the first "free" masons were in fact stone masons who organized themselves into groups similar to the medieval guilds. the guilds, called maestranze in sicily, were skilled craftsmen who banded together to protect their income, profession and social position. this was part of a general trend across europe, particularly in the cities, where the guilds even built their own churches."

scan through this link if you want to read about the pope and what happened. it's very information dense, and a massive shift in world history, in the rome vs jews battle, which is why you never hear of it: https://www.npr.org/2018/04/24/605252936/why-pius-ix-might-be-the-most-important-pope-in-modern-church-history

many of you have fallen under the trap of attacking the catholic church, because you come from a nation born by masons. criticise them all you want, but at least they understood the jews and tried to stop them, unlike pussy protestants who have always enabled and aided them.

1848 is played off as though the revolutions were just spark ups that failed and not worth talking about, but they didn't. they forced several monarchies to become constitutional monarchies, which allowed the 'people' to neuter their power, which allowed jewish wealth and propaganda to dictate the direction of the nation, rather than the monarch. 1848 was basically the prelude to ww1, where, whilst the european nobles managed to use their still extant state power to crush the 'revolutionaries', the jews demonstrated clearly that they now held power over the people, and their ability to induce economic shortages timed with propaganda was a serious threat.

random side note: the founder of pfizer was a revolutionary in 1848 who fled to america and started pfizer in 1849.

There's a reason why 1848 is swept under the rug, and nobody will openly talk about the judeo-masonic incitement of it aside from 'nazi propaganda': https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/083/137/319/original/ebf108a348325ee4.jpg i did find this scholar mention it 'indirectly' by using the term 'armed maestranze': "but as ferdinando malvica, author of a major unpublished contemporary chronicle of the palermitan revolution pointed out, the streets soon also filled with armed maestranze (members of craftsmen’s corporations) and, more disturbingly, with squads from the surrounding countryside: these, he wrote, were ‘ferocious men, almost devoid of human feeling, as bloodthirsty as they were boorish, ugly people by whom the beautiful civic capital of sicily found itself surrounded, infernal tribes razze infernali peopled only by creatures in whom nothing was human but their sunburned countenances’." https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n05/christopher-clark/why-should-we-think-about-the-revolutions-of-1848-now maestranze was the term used for 'guilds' in medieval italy: "in north-western europe the first "free" masons were in fact stone masons who organized themselves into groups similar to the medieval guilds. the guilds, called maestranze in sicily, were skilled craftsmen who banded together to protect their income, profession and social position. this was part of a general trend across europe, particularly in the cities, where the guilds even built their own churches." scan through this link if you want to read about the pope and what happened. it's very information dense, and a massive shift in world history, in the rome vs jews battle, which is why you never hear of it: https://www.npr.org/2018/04/24/605252936/why-pius-ix-might-be-the-most-important-pope-in-modern-church-history many of you have fallen under the trap of attacking the catholic church, because you come from a nation born by masons. criticise them all you want, but at least they understood the jews and tried to stop them, unlike pussy protestants who have always enabled and aided them. 1848 is played off as though the revolutions were just spark ups that failed and not worth talking about, but they didn't. they forced several monarchies to become constitutional monarchies, which allowed the 'people' to neuter their power, which allowed jewish wealth and propaganda to dictate the direction of the nation, rather than the monarch. 1848 was basically the prelude to ww1, where, whilst the european nobles managed to use their still extant state power to crush the 'revolutionaries', the jews demonstrated clearly that they now held power over the people, and their ability to induce economic shortages timed with propaganda was a serious threat. random side note: the founder of pfizer was a revolutionary in 1848 who fled to america and started pfizer in 1849.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (18).
[–] • 0 pt

A Jesuit found a book in China, called "The Art of War". That's the story the Jesuits tell, but maybe the Jesuits wrote it: the book is about a fictitious character and describes Jesuit war tactics: agents, double agents, sell out your own agent to gain trust, secret societies, and always playing both sides. Jesuits were the last line of defence against the Protestants, and they did it the Jesuit way: By claiming that they were persecuted by Rome (with their general getting a luxury "jail" in the Vatican), they could infiltrate Protestant countries, where they became major players in government, church and secret societies. Whenever there was a war or a revolution, they were on both sides to make sure as many people die as possible. Their main target were Protestant and Orthodox societies. The Rothchilds played a major role as Rome's bankers and they got huge profits out of the wars, but they were not the driving force.

[–] • 0 pt

ahh yes, the 'jesuit misdirect'. fuck off idiot. jews are winning, whites are losing. you can try to make your crap sound as complex and involuted as you want, but it doesn't hold up to the simple observable direction the world is taking.

[–] • 0 pt

Jews stick together as if they were one family - that makes them rich, and they are more loyal to this family than to the countries they live in - that makes them dangerous. But there is no force more powerful than the Counter Reformation, a force that destroys whole countries. The Jesuits are the most powerful of all because they have founded the first schools and universities to forge the rulers of the world and to infect minds with ideologies like Marxism. And they have founded theaters, which became cinema and then Hollywood, to poison our minds with false moral values.

[–] • 0 pt

that was great mate, but of course you have to ignore the simple obvious truth i pointed out so that you can proceed with your nonsensical ranting. give it a rest Qtard, take your misinformation efforts elsewhere.