1848: when the masons took down the catholic church's power (aside from a brief mussolini revival) and forced the pope to flee

578

•

i did find this scholar mention it 'indirectly' by using the term 'armed maestranze':

"but as ferdinando malvica, author of a major unpublished contemporary chronicle of the palermitan revolution pointed out, the streets soon also filled with armed maestranze (members of craftsmen’s corporations) and, more disturbingly, with squads from the surrounding countryside: these, he wrote, were ‘ferocious men, almost devoid of human feeling, as bloodthirsty as they were boorish, ugly people by whom the beautiful civic capital of sicily found itself surrounded, infernal tribes razze infernali peopled only by creatures in whom nothing was human but their sunburned countenances’."

https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n05/christopher-clark/why-should-we-think-about-the-revolutions-of-1848-now

maestranze was the term used for 'guilds' in medieval italy: "in north-western europe the first "free" masons were in fact stone masons who organized themselves into groups similar to the medieval guilds. the guilds, called maestranze in sicily, were skilled craftsmen who banded together to protect their income, profession and social position. this was part of a general trend across europe, particularly in the cities, where the guilds even built their own churches."

scan through this link if you want to read about the pope and what happened. it's very information dense, and a massive shift in world history, in the rome vs jews battle, which is why you never hear of it: https://www.npr.org/2018/04/24/605252936/why-pius-ix-might-be-the-most-important-pope-in-modern-church-history

many of you have fallen under the trap of attacking the catholic church, because you come from a nation born by masons. criticise them all you want, but at least they understood the jews and tried to stop them, unlike pussy protestants who have always enabled and aided them.

1848 is played off as though the revolutions were just spark ups that failed and not worth talking about, but they didn't. they forced several monarchies to become constitutional monarchies, which allowed the 'people' to neuter their power, which allowed jewish wealth and propaganda to dictate the direction of the nation, rather than the monarch. 1848 was basically the prelude to ww1, where, whilst the european nobles managed to use their still extant state power to crush the 'revolutionaries', the jews demonstrated clearly that they now held power over the people, and their ability to induce economic shortages timed with propaganda was a serious threat.

random side note: the founder of pfizer was a revolutionary in 1848 who fled to america and started pfizer in 1849.

There's a reason why 1848 is swept under the rug, and nobody will openly talk about the judeo-masonic incitement of it aside from 'nazi propaganda': https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/083/137/319/original/ebf108a348325ee4.jpg i did find this scholar mention it 'indirectly' by using the term 'armed maestranze': "but as ferdinando malvica, author of a major unpublished contemporary chronicle of the palermitan revolution pointed out, the streets soon also filled with armed maestranze (members of craftsmen’s corporations) and, more disturbingly, with squads from the surrounding countryside: these, he wrote, were ‘ferocious men, almost devoid of human feeling, as bloodthirsty as they were boorish, ugly people by whom the beautiful civic capital of sicily found itself surrounded, infernal tribes razze infernali peopled only by creatures in whom nothing was human but their sunburned countenances’." https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n05/christopher-clark/why-should-we-think-about-the-revolutions-of-1848-now maestranze was the term used for 'guilds' in medieval italy: "in north-western europe the first "free" masons were in fact stone masons who organized themselves into groups similar to the medieval guilds. the guilds, called maestranze in sicily, were skilled craftsmen who banded together to protect their income, profession and social position. this was part of a general trend across europe, particularly in the cities, where the guilds even built their own churches." scan through this link if you want to read about the pope and what happened. it's very information dense, and a massive shift in world history, in the rome vs jews battle, which is why you never hear of it: https://www.npr.org/2018/04/24/605252936/why-pius-ix-might-be-the-most-important-pope-in-modern-church-history many of you have fallen under the trap of attacking the catholic church, because you come from a nation born by masons. criticise them all you want, but at least they understood the jews and tried to stop them, unlike pussy protestants who have always enabled and aided them. 1848 is played off as though the revolutions were just spark ups that failed and not worth talking about, but they didn't. they forced several monarchies to become constitutional monarchies, which allowed the 'people' to neuter their power, which allowed jewish wealth and propaganda to dictate the direction of the nation, rather than the monarch. 1848 was basically the prelude to ww1, where, whilst the european nobles managed to use their still extant state power to crush the 'revolutionaries', the jews demonstrated clearly that they now held power over the people, and their ability to induce economic shortages timed with propaganda was a serious threat. random side note: the founder of pfizer was a revolutionary in 1848 who fled to america and started pfizer in 1849.

(post is archived)