WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

you get your spirit from your for-father this is correct for all nations So if a white male person lays with a Asian or East Indian woman as (example) and the child comes out looking as that nation say east or Asian with similar color (that child is still a while males descendant) as that child carries (his spirit) patrilineage >>not matrilineage. the (jews use matrilineage.)

which is ((false)) the bible was never matrilineage. always patrilineage

Numbers 1:18 “And they assembled all the congregation together on the first day of the second month, and they declared their pedigrees after their families, by the house of their fathers, according to the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, by their polls.”

you get your spirit from your for-father this is correct for all nations So if a white male person lays with a Asian or East Indian woman as (example) and the child comes out looking as that nation say east or Asian with similar color (that child is still a while males descendant) as that child carries (his spirit) patrilineage >>not matrilineage. the (jews use matrilineage.) [matrilineage](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrilineality_in_Judaism) which is ((false)) the bible was never matrilineage. always patrilineage [matrilineage](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrilineality) Numbers 1:18 “And they assembled all the congregation together on the first day of the second month, and they declared their **pedigrees** after their families, by the house of their fathers, according to the number of the names, from twenty years old and upward, by their polls.”

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I thought the two different genealogies in Matthew and Luke show that Jesus is a descendant of David and thus has right to be King. Matthew provides the legal aspect, as the oldest son of Joseph through adoption, and Luke give the genetic aspect, that Mary was a descendent of David. This site gives a good explanation of the two genealogies - http://www.abideinchrist.com/messages/onlylegitimatemessiah.html

[–] 1 pt

How can Christian faith be based on this contradictory mess of a book?

[–] 0 pt

It's not a contradictory mess. Jesus had to be a son of David. But the kingly line had been cursed, so while Jesus was heir to the throne through Joseph he was a true son of David through Mary. I know it's a TLDR article for you, but the link I put does explain the reason for the two genealogies. Willful ignorance is not a virtue.

[–] 1 pt

And Joseph knew her not until after the baby was born. Ya gotta remember the whole story. Joseph took a pregnant Mary for his bride. He did not knock her up himself. The scripture states that the messiah would be born of the house of David, it never said that it would be genealogical descendant of David.

[–] 1 pt

I had an ancestor dream where I met 5 of my forefathers.

You're more genetically related to your mother than your father due to how mitochondrial DNA works. The only thing patriarchal line carries are expressive genes, why place importance on that? Just curious.

[–] 0 pt

Abraham's heir was determined by the mother.