WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

981

Grabbed from faggot-ass Reddit

Grabbed from faggot-ass Reddit

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Oh you thought the process of rewriting/erasing history was just the ministry telling people what was "true" and what was "false"?

You ever read or watch 1984 and wonder why so few revolted?

They weren't just rewriting and erasing history. It was a detailed job, with legions of bureaucrats.

The other half of 1984 that gets so overused that people dont realize the importance of it is: propaganda.

When the state tells people "it didnt happen." the people believed it. Thats the important bit.

We went to the moon.

The communists want to erase that and rewrite doubt over history. And they're using rumors to do it.

[+] [deleted] 5 pts
[–] 4 pts

We went to the moon.

The communists want to erase that and rewrite doubt over history.

It doesn't stand up to scrutiny, even back then. I understand that, as the pile of lies grow, it becomes harder and harder to examine every individual event for the truth, but the Moon landing never happened. Best comprehensive series on the topic: http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/ though Mathis has done a number of smaller deep-dives into such topics as the life-support systems, supposed engine designs, etc.

I hope you didn't really think 9/11 was the first large-scale faked event - the sinking of the Brittanic (which we remember as the Titanic) wasn't even the first large scale faked event.

[–] 2 pts

You are a jew trying to erase White history.

White Americans went to the moon with the help of German Nazi rocket scientists. The USSR would have proved it fake if it were.

9/11 happened. I went to the two towers when they existed, and they don't exist anymore. Maybe you are too young to remember that, but that doesn't mean that it happened.

You are a jew trying to erase White history.

[–] 1 pt

People now debate whether 9/11 happened?

[–] 1 pt

"The moon landing was real cuz all the news channels in america said it was. If it was fake the news channels would have said so when Russia told them it was fake"

Nobody is claiming that controlled demolitions didn't happen on 9/11. Buildings being empty and torn down isn't the same as a bunch of towel heads using box cutters to fly planes into buildings while NORAD sits on their dicks, despite what (((fox news))) told you.

"We wuz astronauts and sheeeeeeet"

[–] 0 pt

The USSR would have proved it fake if it were.

This is a classic limited-hangout trope, and assumes that countries' diplomacy is such that they actually are competing. So much has been written on this by others. Start reading, I gave you two good starting points. You need to actually sift through minutia yourself to have any reasonable grasp of a subject, and I gave you the two best collections of minutia available.

9/11 happened. I went to the two towers when they existed, and they don't exist anymore.

There is more than one way to fake something. 'Demolition' is the truth, 'planes causing catastrophic collapse of a building located across the street which wasn't even damaged' is the fakery.

You are a jew trying to erase White history.

You are a jew pushing well-proven jewish lies.

[–] 0 pt

All one has to do is watch Astronauts Gone Wild and see they are plainly lying.

They are deer caught in the headlights lying.

[–] 2 pts

I was with you until I realized you are a fucking idiot. We didn't go to the moon period... the communist and capitalist are just red man blue man distractions to divide and conquor... the elite of China are communist the elite of America are communist and capitalist

THE JEWS WHO OWN THEM ALL ARE PEDOPHILE SATANIC SPAWNS FROM HELL

[–] 0 pt

Went to the moon? Hahahahahah

[–] 0 pt

The world is run by all the same people it seems though.

[–] 0 pt

The world is run by all the same people it seems though.

Probably descendants of the Medici family.

Consider: They had what, three, or four popes? Kings, emperors. They were the first "international bankers." I see no reason why they should have, in a relatively short span of time, simply have collapsed.

It seems a paltry innovation from that point of view to say "why dont we create new fronts, the rothchilds and warburgs and pretend our family lost power and relegate it to the history books."

Incidentally the same tact the soviets appeared to take: pretend to fail/collapse, come back under a new name and structure.

[–] 0 pt

Fascinating, yeah, why not.

What is hard to convince people is that they are quite monolithic, tribal, enduring, dominating.

Whoever they are.

Personally I believe the devil is at the helm and these people are his pawns.

After seeing the Medici TV show on Netflix it made me think why would they want to glorify a european noble family? It seems odd, but despite all faults of the Medici family, they bankrolled a lot of fantastic artists and architects such as Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and Botticelli that contributed greatly to the Renaissance. The Florence Cathedral is beautiful as well