Ironic, considering your post, which I quoted, literally put words in his mouth using the phrase 'Here's what you're actually saying'. Lol
Get off your fucking alt dickhead.
Most of us old goats know better. I gave you a cite for further reading. Unfortunately, your position just as uncitable as it is untenable.
< Insert line asking the weather in Tel-Aviv
Most of us old goats know better. I gave you a cite for further reading. Unfortunately, your position just as uncitable as it is untenable.
First, never heard of the site so I'm not clicking on it.
Second, why should I trust anything you argue is argued in good faith when almost everyone I've ever encountered who supports flat earth is some globohomo faggot sitting in a CCP, ADL, or fusion center office?
First, never heard of the site so I'm not clicking on it.
Shit argument. How did you discover this backwater site if you don't click on things you don't recognize?
Second, [...] almost everyone I've ever encountered who supports flat earth
What? Even if that statistical relation were true, it is the gamblers fallacy to apply it to me (en.wikipedia.org) (you've heard of Wikipedia, right?), and I never even mentioned flat earth.
Actually, flat earth is an attempt to discredit by association, much as they attached druggies and otherwise losers to the antiwar efforts of the 60s (which originally included PhDs, many academics, etc) to discredit them similarly by association. It worked.
They then used the strategy again during the Occupy Wall Street protests, when they attached 'antiestablishment bums' to what was originally a semi-conservative cause. This was also successful.
(post is archived)