Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Between 1899 and 1946 the US dominated the Philippines under Colonial rule, dictated by the growing economic and imperial competition that is to say against the Spanish.

Sovereignty was passed over to the US via the Treaty of Paris, disregarding Filipino diplomatic consultation, for 20 Million.

In 1899, the Philippine-American War broke out, with the US tightening security the Filipino nationalists picked up Guerrilla warfare which was ultimately defeated by the US but only through the utter destruction of Civilian property, blood, and war radicalization. Torture and death of Filipino prisoners became rampant. In the end a total of 200,000 civilians were dead. The colonial state was inaugurated with a Sedition Act that banned expressions in support of Philippine independence, a Banditry Act that criminalized ongoing resistance, and a Reconcentration Act that authorized the mass relocation of rural populations.

In defense of Imperial Japan, I think it is noteworthy to point out Japan as “Natural Resource Deprived” It should by now be accepted Japan expanded her borders because of the economic warfare waged on the Tripartite Act, embargoing oil, and freezing Japans assets left the country shieldless against Bolshevik hordes that had already split China from the inside out. It was under necessity for Japan to expand those borders which was intrinsically tied to the liberation of Asian people, that is to say the cases of alleged Japanese mass murders (Rape of Nanjing) are always built off minimum evidence, and foreign press narratives that sneak into post enlightenment propaganda used for moral high ground after the war.

The Asian people were, on the contrary to Judeo-Masonic Post-Enlightenment, very happy to see its Japanese brothers save them from the clutches of Anglo-American rule, the question of the day is now the question of the year, was imperialism in Japans pretext immoral?

Between 1899 and 1946 the US dominated the Philippines under Colonial rule, dictated by the growing economic and imperial competition that is to say against the Spanish. Sovereignty was passed over to the US via the Treaty of Paris, disregarding Filipino diplomatic consultation, for 20 Million. In 1899, the Philippine-American War broke out, with the US tightening security the Filipino nationalists picked up Guerrilla warfare which was ultimately defeated by the US but only through the utter destruction of Civilian property, blood, and war radicalization. Torture and death of Filipino prisoners became rampant. In the end a total of 200,000 civilians were dead. The colonial state was inaugurated with a Sedition Act that banned expressions in support of Philippine independence, a Banditry Act that criminalized ongoing resistance, and a Reconcentration Act that authorized the mass relocation of rural populations. In defense of Imperial Japan, I think it is noteworthy to point out Japan as “Natural Resource Deprived” It should by now be accepted Japan expanded her borders because of the economic warfare waged on the Tripartite Act, embargoing oil, and freezing Japans assets left the country shieldless against Bolshevik hordes that had already split China from the inside out. It was under necessity for Japan to expand those borders which was intrinsically tied to the liberation of Asian people, that is to say the cases of alleged Japanese mass murders (Rape of Nanjing) are always built off minimum evidence, and foreign press narratives that sneak into post enlightenment propaganda used for moral high ground after the war. The Asian people were, on the contrary to Judeo-Masonic Post-Enlightenment, very happy to see its Japanese brothers save them from the clutches of Anglo-American rule, the question of the day is now the question of the year, was imperialism in Japans pretext immoral?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 3 pts

Japan occupied the Philippines against their wishes in the first place. They colonized their country, and expected them to join.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Japan occupied the Philippines because it was in both of their interests whether they knew it or not, yes the Filipinos really just wanted to be left alone at that point, but it was necessary for both countries Japan wanted to help, it wasn't some Greater east Asia Co-Prosperity conspiracy theory. Most if not all countries in the Asian basin held their arms out for Japan. The Filipino dream was independence from decades of Colonialism from Spain and the US, Japan did not Colonize it however, I will say there most likely was a few Japanese atrocities here and there speaking from a logical feasibility perspective and such is the nature of war. but it should also be kept in mind, most atrocious narratives are the product of foreign press, and if true at the most, Whos to say the atrocities were actually on Civilians, for all anyone knows those “civilians” could have been Chinese partisans and Communist moles. We’ve heard the same accusations against all Axis powers, they are all fake lmao. funny how we never talk about allied atrocities.