Between 1899 and 1946 the US dominated the Philippines under Colonial rule, dictated by the growing economic and imperial competition that is to say against the Spanish. Sovereignty was passed over to the US via the Treaty of Paris, disregarding Filipino diplomatic consultation, for 20 Million. In 1899, the Philippine-American War broke out, with the US tightening security the Filipino nationalists picked up Guerrilla warfare which was ultimately defeated by the US but only through the utter destruction of Civilian property, blood, and war radicalization. Torture and death of Filipino prisoners became rampant. In the end a total of 200,000 civilians were dead. The colonial state was inaugurated with a Sedition Act that banned expressions in support of Philippine independence, a Banditry Act that criminalized ongoing resistance, and a Reconcentration Act that authorized the mass relocation of rural populations. In defense of Imperial Japan, I think it is noteworthy to point out Japan as “Natural Resource Deprived” It should by now be accepted Japan expanded her borders because of the economic warfare waged on the Tripartite Act, embargoing oil, and freezing Japans assets left the country shieldless against Bolshevik hordes that had already split China from the inside out. It was under necessity for Japan to expand those borders which was intrinsically tied to the liberation of Asian people, that is to say the cases of alleged Japanese mass murders (Rape of Nanjing) are always built off minimum evidence, and foreign press narratives that sneak into post enlightenment propaganda used for moral high ground after the war. The Asian people were, on the contrary to Judeo-Masonic Post-Enlightenment, very happy to see its Japanese brothers save them from the clutches of Anglo-American rule, the question of the day is now the question of the year, was imperialism in Japans pretext immoral?