WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Polish solider blaming Neville Chamberlain for the destruction of Poland.

Polish solider blaming Neville Chamberlain for the destruction of Poland.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

They should've been.

Everyone should have been, but expectation is different than reality. Stop trying to scapegoat Britain, it's childish.

So why was nothing done?

The same can be said by every continental European power. The Jew rats were kicked out of 109 countries and yet keep being let back in because of a few greedy bastards in respective nations ruling parties.

Because the royals were complicit.

Why has Poland historically harboured Europes largest and most significant Jewish community for centuries? I am asserting with absolute authority, than not a few dodgy oligarchs, but all of Poland is implicit in founding European Jewry in Europe for the best part of a millennia of documented history.

Why was nothing done?! 20% of Poland killed by Germany was not enough!

[–] 0 pt

>Why has Poland historically harboured Europes largest and most significant Jewish community for centuries?

Jews took over Poland because of the greed of the nobility. They measured their wealth in peasant tenants, and they employed jews as mercenary tax collectors. Never mind that they would get the peasants drunk then swindle them for all their wealth. When the peasants rebelled (The Deluge & other incidents), the landowners sided with the jews.

Why do many though? Poland was the site of a doomsday cult lead by a crazy rabbi named Shabbatai Zevi. It started off with crazy sexual perversions, under the "logic" that the more depraved they were, the sooner the messiah would come and fix things. Eventually this morphed into have as many babies as possible to use up the stock of assigned souls faster. This is where you get the overcrowded stetls crammed with people who are morally opposed to bathing. These were the generative cell of zionism, as opposed to globalist banking which had been their method since they destroyed Babylon. The globalist bankers had always been the bigger threat, because the dumb ghetto dwellers never rose above the level of gypsy scam artist, while the bankers could start wars between empires.

Poland suffered for their bad decisions. Other countries did too, which lead the people to fight back as in Germany, Italy, Spain, Hungary, etc. But England is an island, which meant they never had to pay the piper, they could always foist the bill on someone else. You had no Russians or Turks or Moors waiting to pounce when you screwed up. The fate of the Romanovs should have been the fate of the Windsors. Since that never happened, you still have patriotards praising the queen while she allows Pakistanis to gang rape their daughters by the thousands. And if one of you gets uppity on Facebook and mentions Muslim (or royal!) pedophiles, the cops are ready to bust down the door and confiscate your illegal collection of spoons and butter knives. So knowing this, the brave little Englanders focus all their anti immigrant ire on white Poles, and of course, praise the jews that brought the muslims there.

[–] 0 pt

Jews took over Poland because of the greed of the nobility.

Too convenient, you are unable to accept responsibility for your own actions. You shouldn't make exceptions for Poland who have historically been a base for European Jews.

If Poland didn't exist and there were no Poles to protect and afford safe harbour to Jews, Europe might have been spared two world wars. Why are all Poles responsible for all the atrocities of the 20th century?

Poland suffered for their bad decisions. Other countries did too, which lead the people to fight back as in Germany, Italy, Spain, Hungary, etc

Italy, Hungary, when did they fight back against international Jewry? In the 13th ce?

But England is an island, which meant they never had to pay the piper, they could always foist the bill on someone else.

Sounds like you hold Anglo-Saxons to a higher standard because they are not gypsy scum like you Poles. When your blind hatred goes so far as to blame them for their geography you know you are an ideologue.

You had no Russians or Turks or Moors waiting to pounce when you screwed up.

So immigration doesn't exist because of a channel of water that is only 34km away from mainland France?

The fate of the Romanovs should have been the fate of the Windsors.

The house of Windsor are Germans (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) and didn't even exist until 1917.

Since that never happened, you still have patriotards praising the queen while she allows Pakistanis to gang rape their daughters by the thousands.

Now your misplacing chronological events. The Rotherdam child exploitation scandal was 2013 not 1939.

brave little Englanders focus all their anti immigrant ire on white Poles

10% of all Poles were Jewish in the 1940s, now Poland is home to the world's largest Jewish community yet again. Poles are genetically Slavic Jews, which really is unforgivable. Especially considering they are apparently bameless for their own actions, its always someones else's fault. The world would be so much better off without Poland getting 'swindled' by international Jewry time and time again.

"Anna Grodzka, the first transsexual member of parliament in European history, and arranged a meeting for the Children of the Holocaust."

Haha this is clearly England's fault, why do they keep doing this to Poland?

[–] 0 pt

>If Poland didn't exist and there were no Poles to protect and afford safe harbour to Jews, Europe might have been spared two world wars. Why are all Poles responsible for all the atrocities of the 20th century?

Because the rooftop fiddlers were incapable of planning much of anything. At most they were muscle for some of the revolutions, but in most banker's schemes the muscle was gentile soldiers following orders. They're a nuisance, but not the same threat as a man controlling the entire money supply of the most powerful empire on earth.

>Now your misplacing chronological events. The Rotherdam child exploitation scandal was 2013 not 1939.

No, it means you guys took 70 years to figure it out. But fwiw, the actions leading to the scandal started in the 90s, when various nationalist groups were getting thrown in jail for exposing it. But evidence of royal pedos like Savile and his friends as well as post-Windrush immigrants pimping girls started at least as far back as the 70s.

>The house of Windsor are Germans (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) and didn't even exist until 1917.

They're descendents of Victoria. But even if they weren't, you guys shouldn't be venerating them and should be stopping their schemes.

>So immigration doesn't exist

Immigrants are not armies. They don't overthrow the government, the government invites them to strengthen their rule over the natives.

Really, rather than defending all the crimes of your government, much of which was committed against your own people, maybe you should defend the good things England has done. It's not like I haven't posted plenty of people who were good role models, like Chaucer, Shakespeare, Longshanks & Ramsey.

>Too convenient, you are unable to accept responsibility for your own actions.

Projection at its finest. I wasn't born 400 years ago. The polish nobles that fucked over their own flesh and blood got what was coming to them, or some didn't but should have. Sometimes their karmic debts were paid by their descendents. I'm comfortable admitting that my ancestors weren't perfect. Sometimes they fought with each other, and one or the other or neither was in the right.

You've got your panties in a knot, or knickers in a twist or whatever it is you limeys say, over someone criticizing the actions of Churchill and the government he led. Perhaps you need better role models to look up to.