Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

306

Oppenheimer seems to have thought so, of course he could speak sanskrit and recognized the brahmastra weapon described in the mahabarata and its effects as nearly identical to those of his creation, the A-bomb.

https://www.hinduhumanrights.info/the-bhagavad-gita-oppenheimer-and-nuclear-weapons/

Oppenheimer seems to have thought so, of course he could speak sanskrit and recognized the brahmastra weapon described in the mahabarata and its effects as nearly identical to those of his creation, the A-bomb. https://www.hinduhumanrights.info/the-bhagavad-gita-oppenheimer-and-nuclear-weapons/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (64).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

True, but my reality is not yours and vice versa.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I think you miss my point. Either there is an absolute reality that is objective - the essence of the thing - or there isn't.

If there isn't, the term reality is meaningless. You perceive the world one way, I a different way and every one else their own unique way - cancelling out anything that could be construed as reality.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I suppose it depends on how one defines reality as well as if this is a universe or a multiverse. I know what you are trying to communicate though. Personally I suspect this is a multiverse with many realities.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I've always laughed at the "multiverse theory". It's what modern physicists posit to muck up the discussion while getting a paycheck under the ruling paradigm.

If there are multi-verses I hereby define them as a universe - that is all that there is. Saying all that there is (Universe) can be divided is nothing but a word game - an illogical one at that.