Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

464

Oppenheimer seems to have thought so, of course he could speak sanskrit and recognized the brahmastra weapon described in the mahabarata and its effects as nearly identical to those of his creation, the A-bomb.

https://www.hinduhumanrights.info/the-bhagavad-gita-oppenheimer-and-nuclear-weapons/

Oppenheimer seems to have thought so, of course he could speak sanskrit and recognized the brahmastra weapon described in the mahabarata and its effects as nearly identical to those of his creation, the A-bomb. https://www.hinduhumanrights.info/the-bhagavad-gita-oppenheimer-and-nuclear-weapons/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (64).
[–] • 0 pt

I didn’t read it since the topic isn’t relevant to me and sounds pretty silly.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

You didn't read what? That there are no nukes? Why wouldn't that be relative to your question? You didn't read it because it seems SILLY? You don't look at evidence that doesn't comport with your pre-conceived views? Good luck expanding your knowledge with that attitude.

[–] • 0 pt

No I didn’t click on the link and reading about anschient nukes is stupid. If that’s what you’re into then I don’t care if you think I’m not smart.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I think we're discussing two different links. My question in regards to your statement that if a headline is posted as a question the answer is usually no.