> The first stage of the Revolution, from 1789 to 1791, was dominated by the Masons, whose numbers had grown at an astonishing rate in the pre-revolutionary years. Adam Zamoyski writes that “there were 104 lodges in France in 1772, 198 by 1776, and a staggering 629 by 1789. Their membership included virtually every grandee, writer, artist, lawyer, soldier or other professional in the country, as well as notable foreigners such as Franklin and Jefferson. However, it was not the Masons who were the problem...they were simply the vehicle. The problem was, rather, a subsect of the Masons known as the jacobins. In 1791, this subsect could be clearly seen. The great majority of the Masons, those who had been responsible for liberal reforms like the Declaration of the Rights of Man were called the Girondins. They tended to be peace-loving and oblivious. They were oblivious to the goals of the subsect of jewish-led revolutionary Masons, known as the Jacobins. It should be no surprise that the Jacobins were led by the violent terrorist and the jewish mouthpiece, Robespierre. The same methods used to such great effect by Robespierre (resulting in the execution of King Louis) were also put into play by the jews during the October Revolution in 1918 (resulting in the execution of Tsar Nicholas II in 1918). The Jacobins use the Girondins to get to Louis, but after the execution of Louis, the Jacobins created a violent and bloody coup against the Girondins. Thousands were guillotined and shot. And so the Revolution became a frenziedly devouring its own children, or rather, the Masons were devouring their own brothers for control as the two factions of the Girondists and the Jewish-led Jacobians fought each other for supremacy. If we look into the origins of Jacobinism, then we very soon come up against the name of an organization called Illuminism, It was founded on May 1, 1776 by a Bavarian (((Jesuit))) named Weishaupt. “Our strength,” wrote Weishaupt, “lies in secrecy. Therefore we must without hesitation use as a cover some innocent societies. The lodges of blue masonry are a fitting veil to hide our real aims, since the world is accustomed to expecting nothing important or constructive from them. Their ceremonies are considered pretty trifles for the amusement of big children." Weishaupt molded Jacobism by infiltrating it with his followers who he gained by appealing to people's religiousness. However, Weishaupt himself despised religion: “That great Protestant and reformed theologians who belong to Q still believe that the religious teaching imparted in it contains the true and genuine spirit of the Christian religion. Oh! men, of what cannot you be persuaded? I never thought that I should become the founder of a new religion." Weishaupt's real purpose was the revolutionary overthrow of the whole of society, civil and religious. He has been credited with founding the idea of world revolution. Elements of all religions and philosophical systems, including Christianity and Masonry, were used by Weishaupt to enroll a body of influential men (about 2500 at one time who could be deceived into obeying him in all things while knowing neither him personally nor the real aims of the secret society they had been initiated into. To issue orders, Weishaupt relied upon codes and pseudonyms, and the pyramidal structure of organization, whereby nobody on a lower level knew what was happening on a higher level. To give you a better understanding of Weishaupt's purpose of infiltrating the Masons, his views toward his purpose, and his (((Jesuit heritage))), one only need to look at his end goals (following) and compare these with that which is written in the Protocols the Elders of Zion (the similarities are easy to see): “We must overthrow all order, suppress all laws, annul all power, and leave the people in anarchy. The law we establish will not perhaps be in force at once, but at any rate, having given back the power to the people, they will resist for the sake of the liberty which they will believe they are preserving. We must caress their vanity, flatter their hopes, promise them happiness after our work has been in operation; we must elude their caprices and their systems at will, for the people as legislators are very dangerous, they only establish laws which coincide with their passions, their want of knowledge would besides only give birth to abuses. But as the people are a lever which legislators can move at their will, we must necessarily use them as a support, and render hateful to them everything we wish to destroy and sow illusions in their path; we must also buy all the mercenary pens [news media] which propagate our methods and which will instruct the people concerning their enemies which we attack. The clergy, being the most powerful through public opinion, can only be destroyed by ridiculing religion, rendering its ministers odious, and only representing them as hypocritical monsters… Libels must at every moment show fresh traces of hatred against the clergy. To exaggerate their riches, to makes the sins of an individual appear to be common to all, to attribute to them all vices; calumny, murder, irreligion, sacrilege, all is permitted in times of revolution.’ “We must degrade the noblesse and attribute it to an odious origin, establish a germ of equality which can never exist but which will flatter the people; [we must] immolate the most obstinate, burn and destroy their property in order to intimidate the rest, so that if we cannot entirely destroy this prejudice we can weaken it and the people will avenge their vanity and their jealousy by all the excesses which will bring them to submission.’ “The soldiers are to be seduced from their allegiance, and the magistrates represented to the people as despots, ‘since the people, brutal and ignorant, only see the evil and never the good of things,’ “’Let us beware above all of giving them too much force; their despotism is too dangerous, we must flatter the people by gratuitous justice, promise them a great diminution in taxes and a more equal division, more extension in fortunes, and less humiliation. These phantasies will fanaticise the people, who will flatten out all resistance. What matter the victims and their numbers? Spoliations, destructions, burnings, and all the necessary effects of a revolution? Nothing must be sacred and we can say with Machiavelli: What matter the means as long as one arrives at the end?” But how does one know that the Jews were really behind the Illuminati and Weishaupt's infiltration of the Masons? After all, simple word association between Tee Illuminati letter above and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is arbitrary, at best. The answer to this question can be found in the 1793 revolutionary-atheist logic. The revolution had been deemed "atheistic" in nature, and as a result, the followers of the revolution had targeted both the Protestants and Catholics for annihilation. In Novermber of 1794, all churches in France were shut down and converted into warehouses, workshops, or stables. However, by 1794, the ring leaders of the revolution were forced to admit that even the jews were a theistic group, and it was wondered how the jews and their synagogues had managed to avoid similar destruction? As a result, the French Revolution began to also target jews. However, no sooner had these attacks commences that Robespierre was executed, and the jewish synagogues were given full rights to existence under newly imposed laws. In this way, Robespierre and his cohorts were merely tools of Weishaupt and his (((Illuminati))). When Robespierre lost his usefulness by endangering the jewish livelihood, he likewise lost his head. He was executed on July 28, 1794. The power of Weishaupt and his Illuminati was above Robespierre and the committees of the government, and which appropriated to itself the treasures France and distributed them to the Talmudists, the rabbinic leaders of the Jewish people, who now (thanks to the revolution) had gained free reign in France. It is also important to note that France had been ruled by Aryan Franks (the descendents of those same men who saved the world from the Muslim Moors). These leaders and nobles, due to their heritage, possessed blonde hair and blue eyes. At the time of the French Revolution, any Nordic features were associated with nobility. The jews, who had aroused in the people a thirst for blood through violent Revolution, now directed all aggressions during Robespierre's reign of terror against anyone with blond hair or blue eyes. Any person with such genetic lineage (even if they were not nobles) became easy targets for the bloodthirsty revolutionary mobs. Of those executed by the mobs, approximately 8 percent were nobles, 6 percent were members of the clergy, 14 percent belonged to the middle class, and 70 percent were workers or peasants. This led to a denordicization of the French population which is still evident today in the relatively small number of blonds found there, despite the fact that Frankish France had been founded and settled by blonde-haired, blue-eyed Goths.