You're confusing the "Libertarian Party" with Libertarians.
Many Libertarians are not for open borders and again reducing regulations on corporations are only bad when they have influence in government.
You're mixing up a organization that has been undermined and has a particular name that is the same as a philosophy. You should try and differentiate the two. The Patriot Act was not for helping Patriots, it was to help destroy Patriots.
I'm not confusing libertarians at all, the philosophy itself is contradictory to human nature. Being a libertarian is like leaving all your doors unlocked because it's more efficient to do so, ignoring the risks of break ins. In the real world Libertarian philosophy is only widely adopted and pushed when it's being used to undermine western interests, notice that right now the marxist liberals are saying the googles and twitters of the world have every right to ban conservatives because its a private company.
This is where everyone plays the "but that's not real libertarianism" card. Nonsense. The "Big L" libertarians are the end result of "little l" libertarianism. There's no other end game here because libertarianism by its very nature allows for the collusion of corporations against individual rights. Human nature favors the concentration of power so it becomes a decision of whether that concentration of power will be controlled in a way that benefits the European People, or in a way that benefits the ((tribe)).
National Socialism which rejected libertarianism created more prosperity in a few decades than any libertarian philosophy because it understood the importance of race. There is no denying the success that they achieved. There's theory and reality, National Socialism is the only form of government in the past 100 years that worked to improve the lives of Europeans. All other forms worked to destroy our people.
(post is archived)