Democracy was first done by the Athenians. It was brand new and a high example of working toward individual liberty. The romans improved upon that and created a Republic which governed by laws that applied to all created by representatives voted upon. The US is a system very similar to the Roman one. Individual liberty is a high civilization mark, us dumb monkeys are working on getting civ to that level, but it's hard with all the retards around slowing the spread of knowledge and wisdom for their power trips. My point is that it is that just because Authoritarianism has gripped society for so long, doesn't mean there haven't been steps away from it like the examples I gave previously. It's not a pipe dream, it's simply a step up in civilization from where we are at. The smaller you make government and allow free markets in all aspects of life the more efficient things become.
Romans got jewed and so did the US, and it didn't take that long from them getting a food in the door to total subversion and soon global domination. Democracy is not robust enough to withstand jewish subversion. As Aristotle pointed out, you can only have democracy in a cohesive society, exactly what the "Nazis" tried to nurture. We are further away from that then ever in this clownworld zoo.
Yes and Rome also had the whole immigration issue population replacement thing too. The US is following incredibly closely to how Rome fell. Of course it took bad actors to take both down. The US and Rome were Republics, not Democracies. Informed masses (without massive coordinated subversion) would allow the system to work much better. I'm not saying a Republic is the best, it's just the best that has existed up till this point. The "cohesive" society thing is exactly what the mass immigration is destroying as well as the self-hatred inducing media. I'm not saying the National Socialists of Germany didn't try and nurture Nationalist, people should be taking pride in their people and their culture for sure. Top down government has always had massive faults though, people choosing what's best for others is very inefficient. Also who would have been after Hitler? Then who after that? The power gets too constricted to a small few. Power should be spread out to the masses as much as possible to prevent psychopaths from running places into shit-holes of death. As in my previous post, I don't believe humans have yet reached this level of civilization because it does take informed/wise people to make it work. The non-aggression principal isn't about pacifism, it's about just not fucking anyone else over while protecting what's yours from cunts.
Agreed, but only authoritarian regimes have managed to hold the line or even put up a fight. Without the elephant in the room first getting addresses, civilization will never progress, but it is to late now. Humanity lost long time ago.
(post is archived)