Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

What eventually became entitled the Textus Receptus or the "received text" (1633) was first presented by Erasmus (Novum Instrumentum omne, 1516). It was compiled from several manuscripts from the 'Majority text,' i.e. the Byzantine (Syrian) text, which were a large number of manuscripts and fragments originally protected by the eastern church from the western church's (Roman Catholics church's) efforts to destroy them (along with attempting to destroy, with unimaginable brutality...

The Majority text were not accessible to the western world until after the 1453 conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Empire. By Christians fleeing from the east into the west, these guarded manuscripts were eventually accessible to western scholars. The significance of these manuscripts is that they are able to be compiled as one Greek source from which to translate, which brought preaching and teaching the Word of God "as is" back into the church.

Click link for a very good article

What eventually became entitled the Textus Receptus or the "received text" (1633) was first presented by Erasmus (Novum Instrumentum omne, 1516). It was compiled from several manuscripts from the 'Majority text,' i.e. the Byzantine (Syrian) text, which were a large number of manuscripts and fragments originally protected by the eastern church from the western church's (Roman Catholics church's) efforts to destroy them (along with attempting to destroy, with unimaginable brutality... The Majority text were not accessible to the western world until after the 1453 conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Empire. By Christians fleeing from the east into the west, these guarded manuscripts were eventually accessible to western scholars. The significance of these manuscripts is that they are able to be compiled as one Greek source from which to translate, which brought preaching and teaching the Word of God "as is" back into the church. [The Tyndale, Geneva, King James Bibles and their source, the Textus Receptus](https://www.authorityresearch.com/Textus%20Receptus/Textus%20Receptus.html) Click link for a very good article

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I understand that most Men/women claim that the Word of God is Fallible, that we cannot and should not trust it. The implies that the Holy Spirit is an incompetent boob. He cannot even get a book written correctly.

Jehovah, who made EVERYTHING, cannot get a book written just as he wants? Or by whom he wants?

See the yew (no J sound) definitely doesn't want their old job given to another people. That's the reason for the gaslighting propaganda on the fallibility of the scriptures. The yew really wants his old job back, fulfilling 2 Thessalonians 2.. The yew, the son of perdition, the Anti christ wants to sit in the temple of god and claim their old job back...

After the yew denied Jesus is the Christ, and became Anti Christ (1 John 2:22-23) The written Word was collected and translated by the people that were not God's people, but are Now the Kingdom of God. And the word was written into English and then translated into every language and given to every people upon the face of the earth.
Yes the scriptures as we have them can be trusted. Man is not more powerful that the holy spirit.

[–] • -1 pt

The KJV and “textus receptus” aren’t the Word of God. They’re copies of the Word of God made by fallible men. The texts weren’t “preserved” after canon, and King James and his group had no more “authority” to “authorize” than I do.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The "church" is the false prophet, they are just copies of the beast synagogue system.

Churches are the Sin of Jeroboam, Omri and Ahab.
Come out of her my people, lest ye be partakers of her plagues.

Churches are about to be exposed, just like the criminal politicians and the son of perdition, anti christ, the yews. BTW - God's true body of believers are Not a band of Pedophiles.