So you know qualitative research into anthropology relies heavily on ethnography and is largely incomplete. It relies on figuratively stumbling across a needle in a haystack so to speak to form more complete data. So finding G. Fryendbergi doesn't necessitate that niggers didn't come out of Africa.
Also not every study that predates this discovery means it was Jewish subversion masked as science, the more information they have means we get closer to more accurate modeling.
There is very little Jew involvement in science you anti-intellectual midwit. Short of a few cases like the bs story of the female viking warrior which was complete nonsense.
Are you jewish?
Read the paper not some bitchute video of a mumbling mong with poor understanding of all the concepts.
Also at guy in the video scoffing at the term evolution, like some functionally retard christcuck is contemptible.
G. Freybergi homonim ancestor from Europe predates Australopithecus from Africa by hundreds of thousands of years. I'm not disputing that.
I take reservation with thinking that all scientific achievement, past present and future is (((filthy rat trickery))), which makes me think you are a low functioning aspie at best, or you're Jewish at worst. Somewhere in the middle would be a creationist.
Remember on the day of the rope traitors get it before the enemy.
(post is archived)