WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

Before I reply, I need context. Are you talking bout the second Robert Sepehr video I posted about Atlantians? Or are you talking about the UN and Occult video?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Oops. I was still too ambiguous. I meant the UN and Occult video.

I really enjoyed the first one, though. It's pretty in line with a lot that I've learned about.

That video is with a 7th day adventist, which is one of many millienail groups (millenial means the second messiah is coming soon ... at the end of the millenium).

I posted that so you could learn about the normie perspective on where Lucius Trust comes from. The video was a great watch for me, but I agree that he doesn't have a full picture on the Lucifer topic. One has to take data from the perspective of the technician reporting and recording it. This is why many perspectives are important.

I can't help but feel like you're nudging me toward something

Not really, I just thought you would find something interesting in that video. I usually watch a video or read a book, then gorge out on all the references, and find the references those books use, and so on. Kind of like how the airways in a lung are formed in more and more smaller and smaller channels. It gives one an idea of the perspectives out there.

From what I know about you, I have a deep suspicion you'd like that Blavatsky book. What you wrote here about what Lucifer is is mirrored there, and it's not at all the same as what Alice Bailey got out of it (I know some theosophy people and they are not impressed by her). I suspect your body of knowledge mirrors what Blavatsky was saying.

I don't think Walter Vieth (in the second video) understands Blavatsky either, but it's good to get perspectives.

[–] 0 pt

Honestly, I never cared much about Lucius Trust to dig much more in to them. I know it's used as a workaround of sorts, but that's the extent of my memory from it.

Yes, from the little that I've read about Blavatsky, there seems to be a great deal of overlap.

I'll tell you something I probably shouldn't, since I'm rather intrigued with where this has gone:
I try not to read most of these philosophers, or any books, really. Of course, this will only be temporary. I'm sort of waiting on some things to unfold at the moment. :)

I broke down and read some Fichte, a little about Hegel and I began reading one of Schelling's books, but never finished. That shit was taxing to get through, man... I mean, I was, after all, reading a German to English translated metaphysics/philosophy book... so, can you really blame me? Now that I think about it, I think an older me would appreciate it a great deal more, though.

Anyway, I don't have a huge amount of patience these days, so while I adore learning new things, I haven't actually read a book in a while.
I'm starting to think my memory is just a bit better than what I always used to think.

As much as I'd rather avoid disappointing you, considering how much I enjoy conversing with you, I think it's practical to just be honest here.