By that point Russia was getting industrial support from America and Germany was falling way behind. They were struggling to simply keep fuel in their vehicles. Their African campaign was failing or failed. Russia had the luxury of American aid. America was committed to quantity. The Soviet advantage was primarily time, aid, and warning in advance of Hitler's attack.
Continue to watch the above channel. He does a really good job of digging through the facts. And they frequently don't agree with popularized historical accounts. Germany did amazing for what they had.
Yes, but Im talking about resources. Im talking about technological superiority and design of vehicles of war.
The Muricans didnt send that. If they did, they would not have worse airplanes and tanks then the Soviets. The Soviet engineers outclassed the western allies.
That's the first I've heard of that. Aside from sloped armor I can't think of any other innovations.
Care to educate me?
The cannon of the tanks could penetrate the heavy German tanks, something the western allies could not do. In fact the Tiger and Panther were created because the Panzers could not penetrate the main Soviet battle tank. Soviets also had more modern planes and access to rockets.
The Soviet tanks were far faster the the British and Muricans. In the video from this post, the Germans who examined captured Murican and British tanks say "when compared to Soviet tanks, they are worse, less technologically advanced, worse guns, worse penetration, worse armor, slower speed."
(post is archived)