WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

This would have been a easy Axis victory if it wasnt for the Soviet champagne. Russians made better tanks and aircraft using mostly guesswork, while under German attacks, but still better then British and Muricans.

Its so sad.

This would have been a easy Axis victory if it wasnt for the Soviet champagne. Russians made better tanks and aircraft using mostly guesswork, while under German attacks, but still better then British and Muricans. Its so sad.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Yes, but Im talking about resources. Im talking about technological superiority and design of vehicles of war.

The Muricans didnt send that. If they did, they would not have worse airplanes and tanks then the Soviets. The Soviet engineers outclassed the western allies.

[–] 0 pt

That's the first I've heard of that. Aside from sloped armor I can't think of any other innovations.

Care to educate me?

[–] 1 pt

The cannon of the tanks could penetrate the heavy German tanks, something the western allies could not do. In fact the Tiger and Panther were created because the Panzers could not penetrate the main Soviet battle tank. Soviets also had more modern planes and access to rockets.

The Soviet tanks were far faster the the British and Muricans. In the video from this post, the Germans who examined captured Murican and British tanks say "when compared to Soviet tanks, they are worse, less technologically advanced, worse guns, worse penetration, worse armor, slower speed."

[–] 0 pt

I see. You're listening to the wrong people.

The Sherman went through several gun changes. But you also need to understand it's a medium tank. It was never originally intended to take on heavy tanks. It's job was infantry support and to counter artillery and other medium tanks. Which it did. It was designed in 1940 using 1930s concepts of war and tanks.

This is not a technology divide. This is a strategy and time divide.

You're also wrong on why later German tanks were created. They had different roles. Medium vs heavy vs the always evolving theater changes. This also drove gun changes in the Sherman and other tanks by all, and guns fielded by America and Germany.

The bulk of Soviet aircraft were shit. Most were WWI or slightly after. Casualties were high because they sucked. The donated Airacobra was American and influenced their other designs. Its cannon allowed it to be an effective tank buster. Only late in the war did their numbers of good aircraft rise. See originally stated reasons. They had the luxury of designing based on what they had experience of what worked. Whereas Germany was over extended and pushing in the wrong areas. Even Japan was developing better aircraft than the Soviets.

Rockets were an American invention. See Robert Goddard. The Germans were the first to embrace. The Soviets and Americans followed. You'll even find rocket racks for Shermans.

The good Soviet tanks were designed almost a half decade after all the others. But they entered the war late for a variety of reasons. All with the benefit of observing modern war to drive the design.