Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

179

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

That's because the Israelites were fair skinned whites, with red, brown, or blonde hair, and frequently wore blue eyes.

The Jews are hybrids from Esau where the above is not so. They are the Edomites and Pharisees. God commanded they be genocided. The Israelites failed. They are told they would come to suffer because of this.

We know what happened. Jews are spinning and revising history.

[–] • 2 pts

So.... We wuz the real Jews n shiet?

[–] • 1 pt

No. The jews are the jews. We are the Israelites. "Jew" didn't enter the bible until the 17th century.

[–] • 0 pt

To your other response.

17th century

Mid 1800s, so 19th.

Also it wasn't israel so they weren't israelites. It was Judea, and Judeans.

[–] • 0 pt

My statement remains correct. You jews can't help yourselves. The 1611 kjv is in renewed demand because that was the last version before jew was wrongfully injected. The revision came in the late 1600s (1672, iirc). Which is the 17th century.

Stop revising history. You jews have done that too much already.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

My statement remains correct.

Laff, also no. :)

https://archive.md/Miepk

It is an incontestable fact that the word "Jew" did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word "Jew" did not exist in any language. The word "Jew" was introduced into the English for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play "The Rivals", II,i, "She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew". Prior to this use of the word "Jew" in the English language by Sheridan in 1775 the word "Jew" had not become a word in the English language. Shakespeare never saw the word "Jew" as you will see. Shakespeare never used the word "Jew" in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his "Merchant of Venice", V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: "what is the reason? I am a Iewe, hath not a Iewe eyes?"

https://archive.md/iCJKP

https://archive.md/V7ony

Dude calm the fuck down. You're wrong. That's okay because you wrong about a date.

e: so we're "both wrong" whereas I was referring to English but hadn't clarified such. But 1775 isn't the 17th century, it's the 18th century. Then you go spewing off like a nigger. Calm the fuck down.

[–] • 0 pt

israel's Judea's

But yes.

[–] • 0 pt

well yes, Israel are white tribes, aside from Judah the modern jews

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Judah is not the modern Jews. Modern Jews are the Edomites and Pharisees. The talmud is the recorded oral tradition of the pharisees.

[–] • 0 pt

Pharisees are not a people, they were a cult of jews

plus the Bible shows the jews as mostly evil cunts who hate the other tribes, kill prophets, hate God and kill Jesus. it checks out when it comes to the modern ones

[–] • 0 pt

The pharisees are a collection of edomites and others who falsely claimed heritage of the Israelites. They most certainly are relevant. Especially since their talmud holds significant influence today.

[–] • 0 pt

gibs me back dat homeland

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, jews have weaponized blacks here too so the ignorant can attack people. Useful idiots are everywhere.