why?
will there be enough Q-tards to be relevant after the 20th?
because when someone REPEATEDLY does appeals to popularity, it usually means that they're a skeleton crew.
will there be enough Q-tards to be relevant after the 20th?
No.
why?
Because it's not true until then. This is just as retarded as quckoldry. You know this to be true and are acting like a kike whose sole goals is to D&C.
It's retarded. Stop. It's not the 20th yet.
None of that is to say he won't be inaugurated. What it's very clearly saying is: that hasn't happend yet, so the statement "Biden is your president" is blatantly false.
so you're agreeing with me that Q is mainly sock puppets?
I don't think I made any comment that your second section was responsive to really.
What other things have you successfully predicted?
how is identifying a rhetorical fallacy a prediction?
(post is archived)