We backed the wrong team.
The same Churchill that chose war over peace after Dunkirk.
Churchill is the embodiment of the Eternal Anglo - as dirty as a jew and always opposed to continental Europe in every way, unless he can benefit... and too stupid to realize he would benefit greatly without jews.
dave medsker
10h that's one perspective.
The other perspective, via monday morning QB, is that England escaped German conquering by a C-hair. One French Frigate could have made the difference. Churchill, in retrospect, was guided by God.
France fell, it was their duty to fall in. 2 1 284
Beeds89 Voice in the Wilderness
13h Maybe some of them were relatives of some of the victims of the French Revolution? 117
USA
11h Crazy story never knew this fact 90
Quαdrant C₳pital
8h If the British had "played fair", they might have lost the war. The correct option would have been to sail the fleet to Britain. Sad but true. Only Churchill could have done this. 89
Gary Leikam
8h Why is this the first time I have come across this information? I was born in the early years of the Baby Boom following the end of the war, and have always thought I was fairly knowledgeable about WWII history. 92
CaptainTLB60
13h So I hate to read bad things about Winston Churchill…. But you don’t have to read very deeply to realize his was a brutally complex legacy. We probably couldn’t have defeated the Germans as early as we did without him, and for that, many lives were probably saved. But some of his decisions, coupled with earlier career debacles like his role at Gallipoli were horrible by most objective standards. 1 1 752
BuckarooBonzai
13h The British did this to the Dutch during the Napoleanic wars.
It was terrible and they were right to do it then, as they were to the French fleet.
Surrendering their fleet to the British would’ve meant they kept their fleet, and it would’ve remained commanded and operated by French forces, just not Vichy French forces.
The long standing dislike of each other, stemming from Middle Age wars surely was a component in the decision making on both sides. 1 4 1,294
W
8h Fragile friendship… 44
Jon Orgen
14h I've read Churchill's memoirs and some other things. Militarily, this destruction is understandable. And the assurances from the French side were rather vague and uncertain. This is evident simply from the fact that the ships weren't ordered back to England.
Similarly, the French government lured 300,000 British soldiers into a trap on the continent. And these soldiers only narrowly escaped, thanks to the unwavering support of the French military at the front, across the Channel (Dunkirk). This was achieved in an unprecedented armada of boats that crossed the Channel multiple times. 1 955
Muslim Traveler
14h Indeed Also interesting to note that the French Vichy government actually retaliated to this attack from its airforces in Africa by bombing Gibraltar several times from after Mers El Kebir attack, July 3rd until September 25th, sinking a ship there and inflicting casualties to british troops and civilians. For like 2 months the U.K and Vichy France were technically at war. Also another important thing to not, and this is even worst, is that in preparation to operation Overlord, Normandy, British and American air forces bombed several villages and cities, including Paris itself, killing tens of thousands of civilians if I remember correctly, to the point that De Gaulle and his FFL (Forces Française Libres) protested and asked for more efforts to avoid civilians casualties.
WW2 was a bloody nasty business... 853
ThatJasonGuy
13h Your regular reminder that wars are never clear-cut cases of good vs. evil, that morality is a spectrum, and that 'European solidarity' is just a few strips of duct tape covering over the power struggle that never went away. 1 512
ChetTheJet
12h True: (1) British sank a French fleet, 1940: Operation Catapult, July 3, 1940. (40% of Vichy tonnage) (2) Germans did nothing to capture it in 1940: Due to armistice assurances. (3) French scuttled their own (different) fleet in 1942: Toulon, November 27, 1942.
IMO the Brits made the correct decision. Assuming the Germans would not have attempted to capture that scuttled fleet in violation of the armistice would be erroneous - which is why the French scuttled the remainder in 1942 to prevent just that.
God, make the boomercons go away.
More teletubbies and aspartame for da kidz! Yeah
I don't know what your cryptic message means.