WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

173

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You should look more into it. Statically probability of all the required factors for male/female aligning in proximity of time and location are basically zero. This is no small thing you dismiss. Mainstream loves to pretend otherwise. And darwinism has largely been disproved by geneticist anyways. It's silly it's still taught at all, but that would open the door for Christianity and they loathe that. Yet many foundational corruptions persist. They really have zero evidence of cross genius evolution. Meaning humans evolve into humans, monkeys into monkeys, dogs into dogs and so, but not spiders into monkeys.

As usual, what geneticists say amongst themselves are very different discussions than what they are allowed to publicly declare and support. Publicly declaring internally, commonly acknowledged ideas and topics is cause to end one's career.

All of this aligns with what the bible says, which is our creator did so on "kinds of things." For example, a "shark-thing" will evolve into a variety of rays, skates, and sharks, and so on. But not donkies or monkeys. Whereas a semian-thing does monkeys and an equine-thing does horses and zebra and so...

Everyone looks to create competing sandboxes when in reality that's a lie and a distraction. It's about complimentary sandboxes. For example, the Indian account of the wars doesn't mean the US account is wrong or didn't happen. When in reality it is simply two accounts from two perspectives of the same thing, using different words and descriptions.

Everywhere you look, we confirm a massive, global civilization of Aryans 13,000 years (including Egypt and the great pyramids) ago and the great flood, as described in the bible 11,800 years ago, changing sea level 400 feet to this day. Worth noting the bible never says 6,000 years.

When I say Aryan, I mean us, someone very closely related to us, and or our creators. Regardless, they left the swastika to identity us.

[–] 1 pt

I believe the version of human evolution we've been sold is a big, fat, lie - especially "out of africa". I think evolution as a theory makes more sense than creationism because there is more evidence supporting it. I admit it's partial evidence, which is why it's a theory, not a law.

[–] 0 pt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MKbT9YxLF4

Unfortunately, there really isn't evidence to support Darwin's theory of human evolution. It has become more of a religion with a priesthood than anything else. Largely, geneticists have confirmed it's most wrong. It's so wrong, Darwinism really has no place in science. It's effectively disproved.

And so we are left with nothing or what variations or what pretty much every ancient civilization attempts to describe. Again, everyone wants to put them into conflict rather than accept they are largely complimentary. I don't fault you for staking your position. But the more you dig, the more you realize your position is not tenable. Yet the priesthood doesn't care.