WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

231

Why do I feel like this will actually be used for OVER-diagnoses and OVER-medication like what always seems to happen?

From the post:

>Groundbreaking new autism research suggests that already-rising diagnoses could jump more significantly in the coming years if a new framework for understanding the condition comes into play. The latest research out of Princeton University and the Simons Foundation uncovered four unique subtypes of autism, each with its own genetic 'fingerprint' - finally explaining why some children show signs early while others aren't diagnosed until school age. Researchers have uncovered the missing link in autism's origins by connecting clusters of behavioral traits to specific genetic differences, discovering that each autism subtype has remarkably distinct DNA profiles.

Why do I feel like this will actually be used for OVER-diagnoses and OVER-medication like what always seems to happen? From the post: >>Groundbreaking new autism research suggests that already-rising diagnoses could jump more significantly in the coming years if a new framework for understanding the condition comes into play. The latest research out of Princeton University and the Simons Foundation uncovered four unique subtypes of autism, each with its own genetic 'fingerprint' - finally explaining why some children show signs early while others aren't diagnosed until school age. Researchers have uncovered the missing link in autism's origins by connecting clusters of behavioral traits to specific genetic differences, discovering that each autism subtype has remarkably distinct DNA profiles.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This is BS, trying to establish that rising autism rates have a genetic cause when It’s actually brain damage from environmental factors, mostly vaccines, but also the poison in our food, water, and environment.

[–] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

They would just say that the countries that have lower rates don't check for it or diagnose properly.